Re: Ring a bell to you ?

From: Dylan Sung (dylanwhs.tsktsktsk_at_pacific.net.hk)
Date: 11/28/04 

Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:32:27 -0000

"Marie-Aude" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:1ftat9pxj2o0b.1ktnk1jhhwyku$.dlg@40tude.net...
> Le 28 Nov 2004 01:44:33 -0800, grapheus a tapoté d'un clavier léger:
>
>
>> You should ask him WHO he is, or better said what he was doing from
>> 1968 to c. 1980.. And please, publish his answer. It would be very
>> instructive for all of us...
>
> I think we have something quite interesting here.
> I remember Franz saying that the lawyer carefully wrote his exact
> birhdate,
> in order to be able to find more information about him.
>
> So we have several possibilities, either grapheus just elaborating on that
> to make us believe "something" was found, something that would be so
> baaaaaaaaaad, or grapheus knowing effectively, based on that, what did
> Franz do between these years - which I don't care.

Before Franz's hearing, grapheus was firing lots of missives, but on the
days Franz was in court, grapheus' messages fell by a lot. It could mean he
was at court looking in, in which Franz would have seen him and not know
him, so hadn't sent out so many messages.

>
> How would have grapheus learned that ? I don't know about swiss law, but
> in
> France, some informations can be disclosed only to lawyers, and to the
> people part of this case.
> So either grapheus is part of it, which means that he is Foucaunou, either
> he is not, and the lawyer breached the confidentiality.

Yes, client confidentiality, unless Faucounau told him, if he really is a
separate person. If he wasn't, and Faucounau = grapheus, Rochaix's statement
that (according to Franz about what he said) they are separate people mumble
mumble mumble, and thus perjured himself by lying in court.

Dyl.

Relevant Pages