First Americans may have been Aussies

From: David Christainsen (david_christainsen_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/28/04 

Date: 28 Nov 2004 11:46:58 -0800

Dear Friends,

Reuters
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s1193830.htm

Concerning this contentious issue, does anyone have more
evidence to offer?

Best,
David Christainsen
Wellesley, Mass USA

Relevant Pages

  • Re: First Americans may have been Aussies
    ... > Dear Friends, ... > evidence to offer? ... > Wellesley, Mass USA ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: First Americans may have been Aussies
    ... >> Wellesley, Mass USA ... continually goes beyond the evidence. ... Doug Weller -- exorcise the demon to reply ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Universal Mind
    ... > produce the laboratory notebooks to support this) and never come ... > If you think that there is evidence to support your assertions, ... > increasing the mass. ... > That means it has to fall to the earth from somewhere else in the ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: 9,81 and the "Expanding Earth"
    ... Do you have evidence of the contrary? ... V*density = mass. ... No, I have never said that, and Florian has speculated, and you ... affecting celestial mechanics, and not causing various bodies to ...
    (sci.geo.geology)
  • Re: 9,81 and the "Expanding Earth"
    ... Do you have evidence of the contrary? ... you said it had nothing to do with mass and that makes JT ignorant and a liar. ... florian said so, and so did JT all of you claimed that EE was science and that mass just appeared with all the right stuff. ... what do you think MASS appearing with all the RIGHT STUFF, and not affecting celestial mechanics, and not causing various bodies to collide, clearly that is magic by definition. ...
    (sci.geo.geology)