Re: First Americans may have been Aussies

From: Seppo Renfors (Renfors_at_not.com.au)
Date: 11/29/04 

Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:25:37 GMT

David Christainsen wrote:
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> Reuters
> http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/s1193830.htm
>
> Concerning this contentious issue, does anyone have more
> evidence to offer?

It is pure fantasy. The origins of the native people of America is NOT
the same as our Aborigines. 

-- 
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised 
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Relevant Pages

  • Re: First Americans may have been Aussies
    ... >> Dear Friends, ... >> evidence to offer? ... > It is pure fantasy. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Naturalism as the Religious Basis of Evolutionism
    ... Dennis Arndt wrote: ... evidence for its existence, ... You still have not demonstrated that "Methodological naturalism is ... false explanation for origins, then methodological naturalism is ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Didnt Absolute Truth Used to Be, Well, Absolute?
    ... Just as with the debate ... which side is right (either in the steroid debate or the origins ... Evidence is actually interpreted, and we ... someone's head and says imagine a bullet in your head. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Faith and Skepticism
    ... > We have the same type of evidence for the origin of Christianity that ... > tries to disprove the origins of Christianity. ... place IN HISTORY, so it's only consistent to assess them by applying ...
    (soc.religion.christian)
  • Re: Evolution Deniers
    ... >> You choose not to believe in evolution because it crosses into your ... Disagree all you like, but if you disagree with science for religious ... have a hypothesis that explains the evidence better than existing ... > This NG is called talk.origins, with origins being the operative word. ...
    (talk.origins)