Re: Ring a bell to you ?

From: Dylan Sung (dylanwhs.tsktsktsk_at_pacific.net.hk)
Date: 11/29/04 

Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:06:16 -0000

"grapheus" <grapheus@www.com> wrote in message
news:337ae51f.0411281526.133d434d@posting.google.com...
> Philip Deitiker <Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:<t4oqd.992263$Gx4.687934@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
>> "Dylan Sung" <dylanwhs.tsktsktsk@pacific.net.hk> says in
>> news:30ugf7F35mr58U4@uni-berlin.de:
>>
>> > Yes, client confidentiality, unless Faucounau told him, if
>> > he really is a separate person. If he wasn't, and Faucounau
>> > = grapheus, Rochaix's statement that (according to Franz
>> > about what he said) they are separate people mumble mumble
>> > mumble, and thus perjured himself by lying in court.
>>
>> The real fools here are the people who think they can gain
>> something by further communicating with fools. This stuff is
>> off-topic, grapheus is off-topic, and you idiots simply play
>> into the antics of other fools by responding to them.
>> There are alt groups for these antics, take it to
>> alt.misc.legal.
>>
>> --
>> Philip

Good, now let's look at Faucounau's book, for which grapheus is the esteemed
proponent on usenet. If as grapheus says, time and time again, the method
is not important to the decipherment of the Phaistos disk, then is it
possible to say it is the "ONLY ONE PROVEN" decipherment? How does it
invalidate all the other fifty or so decipherments?

>
> BRAVO, Philip !.. At least there is an intelligent person in this
> group ! At least there is a guy who RESPECTS THE RIGHT of others TO
> PRIVACY, and doesn't play the new game à la mode : " Play a former
> GESTAPO or the KGB agent" !.. (Success of this "historical e-game" is
> warranted !).
> Thank you for your courage. Because you certainly will be attaked by
> the players !..
> Best regards
> grapheus
>

I am asking for clarity about why JF puts up with your constant
representation of his work on usenet, and his suffering bad press because of
grapheus' manner and attitude to those who question the decipherment.
grapheus takes it upon himself to defend JF's decipherment, and it is
reasonable to ask what credentials he has, especially when he criticises the
credibility of others to talk about mathematics when grapheus himself claims
not to be a mathematician. He tries to dig up Franz's past, and he claims to
respect the right of privacy. Truely hypocritical approach from the high
priest of the PD cult himself.

Dyl.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Ring a bell to you ?
    ... >> something by further communicating with fools. ... >> into the antics of other fools by responding to them. ... Good, now let's look at Faucounau's book, for which grapheus is the esteemed ... possible to say it is the "ONLY ONE PROVEN" decipherment? ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Generic thanks
    ... Grapheus, answer this points or be quiet. ... ::> case of the Phaistos Disk's decipherment are of SIMILAR KIND, ... >> interpretation does make sense. ... :Otherwise Hagen can name proofs for the existence of the Minoans ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Ring a bell to you ?
    ... >> But that does not tell me why, for each for them, grapheus considers they ... > There is only one true decipherment, ... why is the "Proto-Ionic Solution" PROVED when others are not? ... Proto-Ioniens.." ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Ring a bell to you ?
    ... >> But that does not tell me why, for each for them, grapheus considers they ... > There is only one true decipherment, ... why is the "Proto-Ionic Solution" PROVED when others are not? ... Proto-Ioniens.." ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Whom was the clever boy then?
    ... way would be by making seven independent paragraphs with the ... shell, 244 studs, inner core, 120 studs + a top hat). ... his "decipherment" was endorsed in a ...
    (sci.lang)