Re: Ring a bell to you ?
From: O.H. (hagen_at_gvdnet.dk)
Date: 11/30/04
- Next message: Lee Olsen: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Previous message: Lee Olsen: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Next in thread: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: Eole: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:24:15 GMT
On 29 Nov 2004 21:52:37 GMT, Philip Deitiker <Nopdeitik@att.net.Spam>
wrote:
>In sci.archaeology, Dylan Sung created a message ID
>news:310sk3F35jb15U4@uni-berlin.de:
>
>> Good, now let's look at Faucounau's book, for which grapheus
>is the esteemed
>> proponent on usenet. If as grapheus says, time and time
>again, the method
>> is not important to the decipherment of the Phaistos disk,
>then is it
>> possible to say it is the "ONLY ONE PROVEN" decipherment?
>How does it
>> invalidate all the other fifty or so decipherments?
>
>Here's the deal, who here gives more than a flying Rat's ____
>about the 50 interpretations of the phasiotic disk? You
>personally may think it is important, outside of a scarce
>handful of people no-one else cares, and there are 1000s of
>individuals that aspire all kinds of crap to all-but
>meaningless objects as part of their obsessive compulsive
>lifestyle. The big picture however is whether in matters.
>
> Why don't we engage in a grand discussion here of whether
>Piltdown man in more representative of ape or human? How about
>a long discussion of whether or not the third riech was a
>christian or pagan organization? How a discussion of whether
>the Cnoyens pygmies at the magnetic island at the north pole
>were green or purple or blue? Do Santa clauses elves have long
>or short noses, and does rudolf's nose glow orange or
>burgundy? Someone I know has a book about the giant hole at
>the end of the earth were other people live inside, weeeeeeee.
>And that author made alot of money on some outright suckers.
>That was long before the UseNet existed. Such foolery is not a
>challenge to science, it is a challenge to fools, without a
>lick of common sense to know what better or not to buy.
>
> Argument in science is about something the concievably might
>be true, beyond what might be true is fiction, popular crap
>that you find in local newspapers.
>
>Idiots belong in killfiles, there is no other effective way to
>deal with them on the UseNet. By engaging in discussions with
>problem people, you become the problem, and you serve their
>ultimate goals. Notice for example that as we have killfiled
>certain individuals in sci.archaeology they have gone out of
>thier way to change their names to rejoin the discussion,
>consider that as evidence that their ultimate goal is to
>create stir around their folly. Inger for example has changed
>her name 6 times since and seppo even more since last march.
> If everyone here killfiled Grapheus, you will see more
>sockpuppets and curious name changes and low and behold you
>plonk those reincarnation and you be surprised the effect that
>has on behavior, the best of all behaviors is that they leave.
>
>--
>Philip
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>Mol. Anth. Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/
>Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/
>Evol. of Xchrom.
>http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm
>Pal. Anth. Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/
>Sci. Arch. Aux
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/
>
>DNApaleoAnth at Att dot net
Yes, is it not incredible: these were ideas that engaged the academic
world just one-hundred years back (I know from my grandfather),
hopefully intelligence has risen a little since, now when we have
rounded the six billion individuals; How many scholars?
What was then so fascinating about the disc inscription?
You see, every child, who became later an archaeologist or a linguist
was engaged in succesful plays concerning treassure hunting, secret
language etc. during childhood.
The unravelling of the riddle of the disc was a prestige-loaded
tangible treassure hunt !
Regards
Ole Hagen
- Next message: Lee Olsen: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Previous message: Lee Olsen: "Re: U of South Carolina Releases Topper Radiocarbon Dates"
- Next in thread: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: grapheus: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: Eole: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Maybe reply: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Ring a bell to you ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|