Re: test
From: Tom McDonald (tmcdonald2672_at_nohormelcharter.net)
Date: 12/25/04
- Next message: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- Previous message: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- In reply to: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- Next in thread: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- Reply: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- Reply: Philip Deitiker: "Re: test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 18:56:46 -0600
Tedd Jacobs wrote:
> "Philip Deitiker" wrote...
>
>>"Tedd Jacobs" <Jacobs@mail.boisestate.edu> says in
>>news:cqherh0uma@enews4.newsguy.com:
>>
>>
>>>seven of the last seven posts haave not gone through.
>>
>>This one didn't go through either.
>>
>>As long as we are in off-topic land.
>>
>>This is Houston, it appears to be snowing outside.
>>If anyone wants to build a case for a snowball's chance
>>in hell, now is your chance.
>
>
> wonderful to see that there is actually a chance of you maturing then.
>
>
I'd have thought that was several orders of magnitude less
likely than the snowball/H(ouston/ell) concatenation? :-)
-- Tom McDonald http://webpages.charter.net/tsmac/tmcdonald2672/
- Next message: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- Previous message: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- In reply to: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- Next in thread: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- Reply: Tedd Jacobs: "Re: test"
- Reply: Philip Deitiker: "Re: test"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
