Re: For Eric S

From: Eric Stevens (eric.stevens_at_sum.co.nz)
Date: 12/31/04 

Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 10:39:31 +1300

On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:09:43 -0700, "Tedd Jacobs"
<Jacobs@mail.boisestate.edu> wrote:

>
>"I.E_Johansson" wrote...
>>
>> "Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> skrev i meddelandet
>> news:mes8t09v01jc23c2l555t9sip8e6opdhn4@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:59:17 +0100, "J. S."
>>> <zedrickno@spam.linuxmail.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >"I.E_Johansson" <inger_e.johansson@telia.com> wrote in message
>>> >news:e0mAd.125563$dP1.451305@newsc.telia.net...
>>> >> Eric,
>>> >> according to information I have had confirmed by my postmaster
>>> >> who checked why there seem to be problem sending mails and
>>> >> enclosements to you, it seems to be a default configuration for your
>>> >> server's in-mails.
>>> >
>>> >Wow. I've been lurking in sci.archaeology for a long time, mainly
>>> >because
>> I
>>> >enjoy reading Inger's posts. This has got to be one of her best, ever.
>>> >
>>> >"confirmed by my postmaster"... Absolutely brilliant.
>>> >
>>> >Apparently Telia has hired real living postmasters to handle the smtp
>>> >communication.
>>
>> Contrary to what J.S. might believe postmasters are human beings. During
>> the
>> years of stalking in groups and sexabuse directed by 7, last six months 2,
>> persons in sci.archaeology and soc.history.medieval, I learnt that the
>> postmasters around the world are more than that. Thanks to postmasters for
>> US suppliers, Australian suppliers and Swedish suppliers I had have help
>> to
>> cut down 5 of them some more than once after they tried to send via new
>> suppliers.
>>>
>>> Who do you think answers mail addressed to (for example)
>>> postmaster@xtra.co.nz ?
>>
>> the latest information from 'my friend' Johnny postmaster telia is that
>> the
>> postmaster at the NZ account seems to have same configuration faults for
>> incomming mails as you have had Eric.
>>
>>> >
>>> >Perhaps there's not very much archaeology in sci.archaeology, but Inger
>>> >certanly makes up for that.
>>> >
>>
>> If that's not personal stalking and abuse intended in those lines, what
>> is?
>
>a guy makes one post and you call him a stalker. inger you're a fucking
>idiot.
>
>eric, do you support this type of behavior that inger is showing towards
>"J.S."?

Inger chose to respond to him a bit further down the stream from the
post which seemed to offend her. I used Google's advanced search to
make sure I wasn't missing a post and discovered that 'J. S.' is a
long-time poster and that in the last five years he has posted about
seven articles which include the name 'Inger'. More than half of these
seem to be in swedish (danish? - Sorry, I can't tell the difference)
so there is no literal basis for Inger's calling him a 'stalker'. She
could of course be using it as a term of general abuse. It would have
been more appropriate to (as I have already tried to do) correct his
obvious ignorance.

Eric Stevens

Quantcast