Re: Request and information
From: grapheus (grapheus_at_www.com)
Date: 01/12/05
- Next message: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Request and information"
- Previous message: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Request and information"
- In reply to: Doug Weller: "Re: Request and information"
- Next in thread: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Request and information"
- Reply: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Request and information"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 12 Jan 2005 13:46:37 -0800
Doug Weller wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 19:45:18 GMT, in sci.archaeology, I.E_Johansson
wrote:
>
> >kenney,
> >you are abusive as usual - what you don't know is that more than 20
> >wellknown scholars as you call it 'risk' their reputation
communicating with
> >me in private.
>
> You've changed what he wrote.
You are playing with words...
> He was talking about being associated with
> you.
And what means "to be associated" ?.. Two scholars who exchange a
correspondence (generally because they DISCUSS - what means that they
don't agree!) are "associated" or not, in your opinion ?
> I know of at least one noted scholar who you wrote to and who wrote
> back to you who certainly does not agree with you.
Have you ever seen two scholars FULLY AGREING on everything ?.. Me,
never !
This disparaging remarks against Inger are really mean...
grapheus
>
> Doug
> >You see they would risk even more if they didn't. Not so many
> >serious scholars would love to be shown over and over being so
completely
> >wrong as you have been in the past. If you sitting on your high
horses
> >haven't bothered to look up the references I sent showing you 100%
wrong,
> >well you will have problem being too close-minded to see that Prime
Sources
> >are essential.
> >Don't bother to send comments. Ad hominem abusive attacks don't help
your
> >case you know.
> >
> >Inger E
> ><kenney@cix.compulink.co.uk> skrev i meddelandet
> >news:cs3ptj$pkp$1@thorium.cix.co.uk...
> >> In article <l_XBd.126114$dP1.454776@newsc.telia.net>,
> >> inger_e.johansson@telia.com (I.E_Johansson) wrote:
> >>
> >> > I would appreciate if you would be kind enough to send the
> >> > information either to the group or to my private mailaddress
> >> > inger_e.johansson@telia.com
> >>
> >> You mean you are actually going to cite a reference? You know
Inger,
> >> I can not see any professional, historian or archeologist, risking
his
> >> or her reputation by being associated with you. Come to that, I
have
> >> seen plenty of cases of you asking for information, but none of
you
> >> posting it. By the way which group are you talking about? You
posted
> >> your request to three groups. When is this article due to be
> >> published, and for that matter where? You keep saying you are
going to
> >> publish something that will astound all the naysayers, but never
where
> >> or when.
> >>
> >> Ken Young
> >> kenney@cix.co.uk
> >> Maternity is a matter of fact
> >> Paternity is a matter of opinion
> >
>
> --
> Doug Weller -- exorcise the demon to reply
> Doug & Helen's Dogs http://www.dougandhelen.com
> A Director and Moderator of The Hall of Ma'at
http://www.hallofmaat.com
> Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.co.uk
- Next message: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Request and information"
- Previous message: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Request and information"
- In reply to: Doug Weller: "Re: Request and information"
- Next in thread: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Request and information"
- Reply: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Request and information"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
