Re: Stalking in Swedish

From: unglued (dragonseed_at_spray.se)
Date: 01/17/05 

Date: 17 Jan 2005 03:29:03 -0800

I.E_Johansson wrote:
> "unglued" <dragonseed@spray.se> skrev i meddelandet
> news:1105898079.953626.208820@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >

>
> Lasse once said, an other question but related to this, that it's
easier
> when you know the person who has been stalked. What many here seem to
forget
> is that it's not be taken seriously that's up. I have had the
pleasure to
> know several of those who sits on posts in Parliament, earlier
Goverments,
> High posts in University and newspaper since the days we either
studied
> together or were working during the 70's together politically. Never
had any
> problems with anyone that really counts not taken me seriously.
Doesn't mean
> that every one agrees with everyone. Only that people who have known
each
> other for more than 30 years respect each others thoughts and
opinion.
>
> That's not a problem. But to be called names and have people
haressing me
> as a person, sending me sexabuse - yes one of the worst 10 showed the
other
> day how keen he is to do so no matter what he tries to 'tell the
world',
> that's stalking.

That's you own definition of stalking and not many people would agree
with you.
For most people it means having a maniac hanging around out side your
door, spying on you and following you around. Everyone with a e-mail
address has it filled with "sexabuse" and harassing messages everyday.
Everyone who participates on the usenet is subject to rudness and
provocations, that's a part of our modern life and it's self inflicted.
No one is forced to expose themselves to the whole world. With your
definition everyone is stalked.

>Apart from which, if you or anyone else don't agree with my
> writing or with anyone else writing, it would be better for you or
the
> someone who does if contra-argument(-s) were presented. No scholar
who wants
> to be taken seriously should try to pick on an other such as some
here have
> done on me. That's to write Ad Hominem or abusive lines instead of
showing
> capability to discuss subject line.
>
> Inger E
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Is it too much paranoia? Or is Inger more powerful than you
thought?
> > > Or is there a real problem?
> >
> > It's a real problem for those who are really stalked (not just
having
> > their posts on usenet made ridicule) but it's not a hotly debated
> > problem here in any sense of the term.
> >
> > >
> > > Andy.
> >

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Skipper
    ... I agree, gekko does demonstrate useful things about writing, ... The point is its attack on someone's useful on-topic posts. ... Yet Blipper feels I qualify as a Usenet "loon", ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Skipper
    ... bringing up three very lovely girls, one of whom was named Skipper ... I agree, gekko does demonstrate useful things about writing, ... The point is its attack on someone's useful on-topic posts. ... Yet Blipper feels I qualify as a Usenet "loon", ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Now We Know Who Ate All The Coronation Street Pies!
    ... Definition of stalking ... Most of those posts seek to end stalking. ... Nobody here cares about your years long dispute with John Pelan. ... I post to a number of groups, nobody has ever in 14 years on Usenet followed me to harass me. ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: Skipper
    ... I agree, gekko does demonstrate useful things about writing, ... The point is its attack on someone's useful on-topic posts. ... Yet Blipper feels I qualify as a Usenet "loon", ...
    (misc.writing)
  • Re: Skipper
    ... one of whom was named Skipper ... I agree, gekko does demonstrate useful things about writing, ... The point is its attack on someone's useful on-topic posts. ... Yet Blipper feels I qualify as a Usenet "loon", ...
    (misc.writing)