Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?
From: I.E_Johansson (inger_e.xjohansson_at_telia.xcom)
Date: 01/20/05
- Next message: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - Emperor Qin's tomb"
- Previous message: Doug Weller: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - Emperor Qin's tomb"
- In reply to: Alan Crozier: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Next in thread: Doug Weller: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Reply: Doug Weller: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Reply: Alan Crozier: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:39:47 GMT
Alan,
what you wrote in your former post isn't exactly what you expressed in the
latest one. With the later I can agree with the former as the sentences were
I can't.
OK Thanks for clearing it out that an absence of evidence can't be treated
as an evidence of absence. That's important. That it can be used as an
indicator one or both ways is a totally different thing.
Inger E
- Next message: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - Emperor Qin's tomb"
- Previous message: Doug Weller: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - Emperor Qin's tomb"
- In reply to: Alan Crozier: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Next in thread: Doug Weller: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Reply: Doug Weller: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Reply: Alan Crozier: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|