Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?
From: Alaca (P.Alaca_at_WannaBee)
Date: 01/21/05
- Next message: Tom McDonald: "Re: King Tut's Tricycle....."
- Previous message: eugene_at_dynagen.co.za: "King Tut's Tricycle....."
- In reply to: I.E_Johansson: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Next in thread: I.E_Johansson: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Reply: I.E_Johansson: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Reply: Billy Bob: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:53:02 +0100
I.E_Johansson wrote in news:3A1Id.128188$dP1.460104@newsc.telia.net,
[...]
Intermezzo
Inger, there is overwhelming _evidence_ that you are not able to argue
without personal attack. But is that _proof_ you can't?
We can adopt the hypothesis that you can if you want, but according to
professor Adler, "for hypotheses, the main source is evidence".
-- -- Peter Alaca --
- Next message: Tom McDonald: "Re: King Tut's Tricycle....."
- Previous message: eugene_at_dynagen.co.za: "King Tut's Tricycle....."
- In reply to: I.E_Johansson: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Next in thread: I.E_Johansson: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Reply: I.E_Johansson: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine in ancient Egypt?"
- Reply: Billy Bob: "Re: New subjectline: Valid and invalid arguments; former: Cocaine ..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|