Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology
From: Eric Stevens (eric.stevens_at_sum.co.nz)
Date: 01/26/05
- Next message: Daryl Krupa: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - mysterious 1513 Piri Reis Map"
- Previous message: Tom McDonald: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - mysterious 1513 Piri Reis Map"
- In reply to: Steve Marcus: "Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology"
- Next in thread: Steve Marcus: "Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology"
- Reply: Steve Marcus: "Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology"
- Reply: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:19:43 +1300
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:50:30 -0500, "Steve Marcus"
<smarcus_spamout_@cox.net> wrote:
>
>"Philip Deitiker" <Nopdeitik@att.net.Spam> wrote in message
>news:Xns95EA6DF736Fprd@128.249.2.19...
>> In sci.archaeology, Steve Marcus created a message ID
>> news:F1OJd.95569$Jk5.89534@lakeread01:
>>
>>> BTW, Eric, got any evidence that I'm a "patent attorney"?
>> For whatever
>>> stakes you care to name (most valuable to me would be for
>> you to simply quit
>>> posting your crap), I now have the evidence to prove you
>> wrong (yet again).
>>
>> Calm down Steve, being ignored by loons and kooks is a good
>> thing.
>
>Agreed. But I don't think Stevens actually does put folks like you and me
>in a kill file (I used to keep files of posts he made to so-called kill
>filed posters almost immediately after he announced his intention to kill
>file the poster).
That's about as honest as your claim that you had kill filed me when
you were using a browser that didn't support kill files.
In fact, if I had intended to kill file you I would not have said I
was putting you on ignore. The fact that I am ignoring you does not
mean that I will allow you to spread lies and half truths.
> I believe that he quite often merely alleges that he is
>kill filing someone as a convenient dodge when his absurdities have been
>shown to be absurdities, and he can no longer defend them in the particular
>thread he was participating in.
>
>What hacks me off about Stevens is that he dishonestly posts that the person
>he was discussing something with did something "wrong" in the discussion,
>when the truth is otherwise. Amazingly, he does that in the face of
>archives such as Google, where the truth of the matter is easily seen.
Google's a great thing. See http://tinyurl.com/4requ
>
>> If I had a dime from all the kooks who claimed to have
>> plonked me I would be a rich man. If we could get all the
>> kooks and loons in s.arch to ignore the science threads
>> instead of dragging them into Off-topic diverticulations, how
>> wonderful that would be?
>>
>> We might actually be able to discuss Georges bronze age
>> funerary objects from Thailand (which every one seems to have
>> ignored).
>>
>> Do Stevens a favor, return the favor.
>
>I can't accommodate you on that. When he posts nonsense, I will be right
>there to point out that he's done so. He is far more dangerous than the run
>of the mill netkook; he doesn't appear to be a kook on the face of things
>such as the Daniel Min type poster.
>
>Steve
Eric Stevens
- Next message: Daryl Krupa: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - mysterious 1513 Piri Reis Map"
- Previous message: Tom McDonald: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - mysterious 1513 Piri Reis Map"
- In reply to: Steve Marcus: "Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology"
- Next in thread: Steve Marcus: "Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology"
- Reply: Steve Marcus: "Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology"
- Reply: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Meaning of Zero and All, Application to archaeology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|