Re: OT to the sexmail-abuser
From: Paul J Gans (gans_at_panix.com)
Date: 01/27/05
- Next message: Doug Weller: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - Emperor Qin's tomb"
- Previous message: Neil J: "The old Cambyses's army chestnut"
- In reply to: Alaca: "Re: OT to the sexmail-abuser"
- Next in thread: Alaca: "Re: OT to the sexmail-abuser"
- Reply: Alaca: "Re: OT to the sexmail-abuser"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:25:55 +0000 (UTC)
In soc.history.medieval Alaca <P.Alaca@wannabee> wrote:
>I.E_Johansson wrote in: mY_Jd.15378$d5.128578@newsb.telia.net,
>> If you don't want to end up in court you have better not continue.
>> Your personal abuse in group lately has been way beyond what's
>> acceptable but your tendency to send sexmailabuse within minuits of
>> my answer to you in a group and from same ISP as you post to the
>> group will make it very very easy for the officials to show you for
>> what you are. Stop sending the sexabuse!!!!
>>
>> Inger E
>Inger,
>I am realy sorry to hear this.
>No one has the right.
Agreed. But Inger, like everyone else on the internet, gets
spam. Some of it is sexually explicit. And almost all of
it comes from forged addresses.
The person she *thinks* sent the e-mail may not have sent it
at all.
The evidence she gives above is consistent with a "harvester",
a computer program that looks at a newsgroup and forges posts
to one poster as if they come from another.
If you check the spam you get you will see what I mean.
----- Paul J. Gans
- Next message: Doug Weller: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - Emperor Qin's tomb"
- Previous message: Neil J: "The old Cambyses's army chestnut"
- In reply to: Alaca: "Re: OT to the sexmail-abuser"
- Next in thread: Alaca: "Re: OT to the sexmail-abuser"
- Reply: Alaca: "Re: OT to the sexmail-abuser"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]