Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?
From: Alaca (P.Alaca_at_WannaBee)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Doug Weller: "Re: Lewes artifacts, Delaware and Pennsylvania"
- Previous message: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ping: Alan Crozier. Translation?"
- In reply to: bernard_connor_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Next in thread: nibblenot_at_lycos.com: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:22:01 +0100
bernard_connor@yahoo.co.uk wrote in:
1107072053.557398.145960@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com,
>
> Three separate samples were sent to different Physics laboratories.
> All three proved conclusively that the shroud was medieval.
>
> Superstitious Crusaders were sold " relics" by wily Muslim merchants.
>
> As Jesus was raised bodily into Heaven, the only relic of him was his
> foreskin removed at the time of his circumcision. ...
But maybe he left his knickers and was raised naked. Who knows?
> '... It disappeared from > an Italian monastery in Italy ca 1970.
> Presumably it rose into Heaven to be reunited with the rest of the
> heavenly body of Jesus.
And that was just one of his foreskins. Imagen they all where reunited with
the (same) body!
-- -- Peter Alaca --
- Next message: Doug Weller: "Re: Lewes artifacts, Delaware and Pennsylvania"
- Previous message: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ping: Alan Crozier. Translation?"
- In reply to: bernard_connor_at_yahoo.co.uk: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Next in thread: nibblenot_at_lycos.com: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|