Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?
From: Martyn Harrison (nospam_at_spammers.of.the.world.unite)
Date: 01/30/05
- Next message: Alan Crozier: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Previous message: Martyn Harrison: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - Emperor Qin's tomb"
- In reply to: Martin Reboul: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Next in thread: Alan Crozier: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Reply: Alan Crozier: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:28:25 GMT
Apparently on date Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:36:46 GMT, "Martin Reboul"
<martin.reboul@SPAMFUKvirgin.net> said:
>Let's face it, it looks medieval, it is covered in medieval paint and it
>appeared in medieval times. There is no blood, no Holy DNA and no indication
>that it is genuine, other than in the imagination of believers.
>
>So, we have to ask the question - where is the real one? Any ideas?
ebay?
- Next message: Alan Crozier: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Previous message: Martyn Harrison: "Re: Interesting archeological discovery - Emperor Qin's tomb"
- In reply to: Martin Reboul: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Next in thread: Alan Crozier: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Reply: Alan Crozier: "Re: Radiocarbon dating of Shroud of Turin wrong?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]