Re: The first Swedes + seed
From: Alaca (P.Alaca_at_is.invalid)
Date: 02/04/05
- Next message: Daniel Joseph Min: "Re: Google Groups Changes?"
- Previous message: I.E_Johansson: "Re: The first Swedes + seed"
- In reply to: I.E_Johansson: "Re: The first Swedes + seed"
- Next in thread: Marcus Gustavsson: "Re: The first Swedes + seed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:07:01 +0100
I.E_Johansson wrote in: IdzMd.129504$dP1.463095@newsc.telia.net,
> "Marcus Gustavsson" <mof@cd.chalmers.se> skrev i meddelandet
> news:ctuav9$fgo$1@eol.dd.chalmers.se...
>> I.E_Johansson <inger_e.johansson@telia.com> wrote:
>>
[...]
>> Well, now on to suggestions as to what we can do to have future
>> discussions that does not lead to trench warfare. Inger, you are
>> very vocal about your distress, and it is sometimes sad to see
>> your inability to defend yourself, but in many ways you are
>> inviting these kind of responses. What I would do, if I were you,
>> is to only discuss matters where you are not doing any research.
>
> No I will not. AND No you wouldn't have had you been me, you
> haven't seen all the cards nor do you know who of persons writing
> here and persons reading this I have been discussing this from our
> different knowledge for years + you don't know when and why I take
> up this or that. It's a very very planned schedule. And apart from
> the idiotic personal attacks from those who aren't willing to
> present one single source themselves nor reading the Prime sources
> no matter if I write exact page or not, apart from them I receive
> positive response. My only problem is that I receive so much new
> information every single day that I have a hard time ordering the
> books from the Library and go there to pick them up. The hugh
> amount of new information gained for example the last 24 hours are
> so much that it will take awhile to find all new questions needed
> to asked to old 'material' = documents from Prime sources to
> excavation report.
>
> In this way you could always refer to well known books and
>> articles.
>
> THAT I NEVER EVER WILL DO!!!!!
> Why? None of those well known books and articles stands to closer
> checking of their sources. None.
> I am not the only one saying that we are more than 20 who found so
> many major faults in all existing works written after 1905 re.
> these questions. The last years works are worst - they haven't even
> bothered checking the context for chapters but picked single
> sentences which out of their context can be interpreted in many
> different ways.
>
>> With time, perhaps, your book about Goths will be in print, and
>> make you some money. Then we will have time to discuss the
>> strangest things.
>
> The book about the Goths will not be edited before my other works
> and the Greenlander's first part will do after the series of
> articles I have been asked to write.
>
> Inger E
>>
>> /Marcus
Inger,
I think you misunderstood Macus Gustavsson here.
He suggests that you stop discussing subjects here which
you are researching at this moment, because there are parts
of that research you (for obvious reasons) can't reveal or don't
wish to reveal. That keeps you on save ground and gives you
a lot of rest and time for your work.
I don't think that is a bad option. Think about it.
-- -- Peter Alaca --
- Next message: Daniel Joseph Min: "Re: Google Groups Changes?"
- Previous message: I.E_Johansson: "Re: The first Swedes + seed"
- In reply to: I.E_Johansson: "Re: The first Swedes + seed"
- Next in thread: Marcus Gustavsson: "Re: The first Swedes + seed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
