Re: archaeology
From: Dylan Sung (dylanwhs.tsktsktsk_at_pacific.net.hk)
Date: 02/09/05
- Next message: Alaca: "Re: Wild cattle and oxen OBS NO MUSK-OX or BISON"
- Previous message: Doug Weller: "Re: Wild kettle and oxen"
- Next in thread: Alaca: "Re: archaeology"
- Reply: Alaca: "Re: archaeology"
- Maybe reply: Seppo Renfors: "Re: archaeology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 17:27:52 -0000
"peter" <p_jay123@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:93a7bcd6.0502090855.923a8f8@posting.google.com...
> your thoughts
On sci.archaeology, recently, it is mostly the probing of what was written
by a certain longstanding female participant, and long drawn out analyses
into what she thought someone meant, as opposed to what everyone else
understood that someone meant, and how everyone but her is wrong, despite
everyone pointing out she was wrong, and don't expect any apolgies either.
Make that, if you help her out of some idiotic reason, she's only going to
turn on you and call you an abuser, or stalker because she hasn't
interpreted what you said as being in her favour. In short, it's all about
interpretation, or a sort of variation of; facts, or a sort of variation of;
sources, or a sort of variation of, Medieval stuff she's interested in, and
the noxious outpourings from some uber-evangelist vengeful bible basher,
though the latter is unduly quiescent of late.
Good luck,
Dyl.
- Next message: Alaca: "Re: Wild cattle and oxen OBS NO MUSK-OX or BISON"
- Previous message: Doug Weller: "Re: Wild kettle and oxen"
- Next in thread: Alaca: "Re: archaeology"
- Reply: Alaca: "Re: archaeology"
- Maybe reply: Seppo Renfors: "Re: archaeology"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|