Re: Wild kettle and oxen
From: Michael Kuettner (miksbg_at_eunet.at)
Date: 02/12/05
- Next message: Michael Kuettner: "Re: Wild kettle and oxen"
- Previous message: Tom McDonald: "Re: Vineland"
- Maybe in reply to: I.E_Johansson: "Wild kettle and oxen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:53:33 +0100
"Philip Deitiker" <Nopdeitik@att.net.Spam> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:Xns95F9A92F5D822prd@128.249.2.19...
> In sci.archaeology, Michael Kuettner created a
> message ID news:3723jqF57dqb9U5@individual.net:
>
> >
> > "Philip Deitiker" <Donevenask@worlnet.att.net> schrieb im
> Newsbeitrag
> > news:_PxOd.182137$w62.146689@bgtnsc05-
> news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> >> "Alaca" <P.Alaca@is.invalid> says in
> >> news:420a9dfd$0$26229$18b6e80@news.wanadoo.nl:
> >>
> >> > Sorry Michael and the rest of shm (including myself),
> >> > I understand the problem, but she escapes again and
> >> > again from sci.a by cross-posting a new thread.
> >> > Nothing scia can do about that.
> >>
> >> Fruitloops always respam the NG line, that's the nature
> >> of a netloon. Assume that if Inger has replied, it has
> >> been spammed.
> >>
> > She doesn't reply, Philip.
>
> Sure she does. Her standard replies is
That's diversion; not replying.
Otherwise a nice summary; but you've left out
her abuse of logic ("you have to bring a counter-argument
to my argument").
> 1. Abuser
> 2. Stalker
> 3. Criminal
> 4. Pornography
> 5. Computer hacker
> 6. Liar
> 7. Unworthy
> 8. Excuses
> 9. Unscholarly
> 10. 3 Am Email from unnamables.
> 11. Prestiguous but unnamable family members.
>
> When all that fails to deride her critics . . . .
>
She starts her massive crossposting.
> I like the 'Tom [tk], you don't know about as native americans
> as some of our Swedish scholars know' . . .
I'm glad that Tom has a thick skin; otherwise he would have
left long ago.
<snip>
> > She starts new cross-posted threads in the hope of avoiding
> questions.
>
> No, she starts a new x-posted thread to continue,
She changes the tune a little bit _after_ it has been shown
that she was wrong as usual.
Current example : Drop linden trees in favour of white oaks.
When she gets stumped again, start on "kettle"[sic].
At any time now her daughter/god-mother/whatever will get sick
or die or whatever.
<snip>
Cheers,
Michael Kuettner
PS : Thanks for the travel report.
- Next message: Michael Kuettner: "Re: Wild kettle and oxen"
- Previous message: Tom McDonald: "Re: Vineland"
- Maybe in reply to: I.E_Johansson: "Wild kettle and oxen"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
