Re: Vineland
From: Philip Deitiker (Nopdeitik_at_att.net.Spam)
Date: 02/18/05
- Next message: Eric Stevens: "Re: Vineland"
- Previous message: mikelist: "Re: Generic Dog ancestor"
- In reply to: Eric Stevens: "Re: Vineland"
- Next in thread: Eric Stevens: "Re: Vineland"
- Reply: Eric Stevens: "Re: Vineland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 18 Feb 2005 22:05:38 GMT
In sci.archaeology, Eric Stevens created a message ID
news:abgc11h8bq05daedr8piqj4ukgsh7dpk54@4ax.com:
ago. There
> is very little argument about the circumstances of its
finding
> (although some have tried to muddy the waters) but a great
deal of
> argument about its interpretation.
There is no argument about its authenticity, just on what
it means in terms of placement and dating. There is an
independent argument about VM authenticity based on its
provenance. Now you are trying to cloud the waters.
-- Philip - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mol. Anth. Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/ Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/ Evol. of Xchrom. http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm Pal. Anth. Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/ Sci. Arch. Aux http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/ DNApaleoAnth at Att dot net
- Next message: Eric Stevens: "Re: Vineland"
- Previous message: mikelist: "Re: Generic Dog ancestor"
- In reply to: Eric Stevens: "Re: Vineland"
- Next in thread: Eric Stevens: "Re: Vineland"
- Reply: Eric Stevens: "Re: Vineland"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
