Re: Annedoti, Anon (Re: A China-Sumer connection)
From: Jacques Guy (jguy_at_alphalink.com.au)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: a.manansala_at_attbi.com: "Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Singular "they". Was Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- In reply to: benlizross: "Re: Annedoti, Anon (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Next in thread: Lukas Pietsch: "Re: Annedoti, Anon (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:36:43 +1000
benlizross wrote:
> Except that (i) Paul is quoting Apollodorus, who is quoting, commenting,
> paraphrasing and interpreting Berossus;
And except that the site in question,
http://www.sacred-texts.com/cla/af/af03.htm,
is a loony bin of creation "archaeology" as "josephus" just wrote (the
modern one,
not the one who preserved Berosus' mushroom-induced Austronesians in
fish
costumes) if you can call that drivel "archaeology", where you cannot
tell
what is fabrication and what is not. Anyway, whatever poor Berosus may
or
may not have written changes nothing to the unbelievably loony claim
that
Sumerians got their language, science, civilization and everything from
visiting Austronesians, whether in fish costumes, in coconut-crab
costumes,
disguised as flying foxes, or, more likely, "déguisés en courants
d'air".
- Next message: a.manansala_at_attbi.com: "Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- Previous message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: Singular "they". Was Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- In reply to: benlizross: "Re: Annedoti, Anon (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Next in thread: Lukas Pietsch: "Re: Annedoti, Anon (Re: A China-Sumer connection)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
