Re: Merchandise harbor Greenland - killing a Myth
From: Todd A. Farmerie (farmerie_at_interfold.com)
Date: 03/06/05
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- Previous message: a.manansala_at_attbi.com: "Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- In reply to: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Merchandise harbor Greenland - killing a Myth"
- Next in thread: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Merchandise harbor Greenland - killing a Myth"
- Reply: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Merchandise harbor Greenland - killing a Myth"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:01:12 -0700
I.E_Johansson top-posted, which has been rectified:
> "Todd A. Farmerie" <farmerie@interfold.com> skrev i meddelandet
> news:422AFA98.40605@interfold.com...
>
>>Soren Larsen wrote:
>>
>>>But Bardson's tale:
>>>
>>> "now the Skraeling have [destroyed] the whole
>>>of the Western Settlement. There are only horses, goats, cattle, and
>>>sheep all wild, but no inhabitants, neither Christian nor Heathen."
>>>
>>>Iis not believeable.
>>>
>>>It presupposes that that the Inuit killed off the settlement without
>>>leaving traces of battle or bodies, released the animals without
>>>killing them- and all in the same summer that Bardson arrived since
>>>European farm animals had bno way of surviving a Greenland
>>>winter on their own.
>>>
>>>I think the smart money is on abduction by aliens
>>
>>You are obviously unaware of what aliens do to livestock. Surely
>>Bardson would have noticed _that_.
> Todd and Soren,
> how about looking on a map, . . .
> . . .to see how far it is between Western Settlement and the
> Sanden described in the end of the text to be close to
Herjolfsnes??????
. . . and on and on and on, . . .
> Guess you missed that as well as the
> reason why this was so important to the Pope . . .
> Had you done your homework you would have known the background
> of Ivar Bardson's grand-grand parents....
> You would also have known . . .
> . . . of course you would have known . . .
> You would have known that King Hakon . . .
> You would have known that there are documentation . . .
> . . . and you would have known a lot more which you obviously
> don't know since you haven't taken yourself time to look . . .
> Your problem.
Inger, none -not one word- of your response was relevant to what
I posted (and I somewhow doubt Bardson or his great-grandparents
had anything to say on the subject, no matter how important it
may have been to the Pope or King Hakon). Do _try_ to take a
minute and read the message before responding with your typical
mischaracterizations, inventions and claims to be supported by
non-existant sources and experts. At least then your
self-indulgent, insulting and ridiculous (but frequently amuzing)
spew can be better tailored to the posts to which you respond.
taf
- Next message: Peter T. Daniels: "Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- Previous message: a.manansala_at_attbi.com: "Re: A China-Sumer connection"
- In reply to: I.E_Johansson: "Re: Merchandise harbor Greenland - killing a Myth"
- Next in thread: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Merchandise harbor Greenland - killing a Myth"
- Reply: Philip Deitiker: "Re: Merchandise harbor Greenland - killing a Myth"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|