Re: Related languages (Re: A China-Sumer connection)

From: António Marques (m.ap_at_sapo.pt)
Date: 03/09/05 

Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:21:43 +0000

On 09-03-2005 12:15, Comm scrived:

> Imo, Chinese have hated Koreans for a long time. Therefore their
> language has to be UNrelated. Yeah, LOL. Imo, the misplaced pride
> of the Anglo Saxonists would require them to dismiss that BIG
> influence of Frech - don't you know the French are decadent? Again,
> LOL. I see agendas.

And you might see indigo elephants.
Chinese and Tibetan ARE related. There's one for the way. French and
English also. Through PIE. Modern French and English share a lot of
related vocabulary through Norman.

> Israli - and we know they were conquered in history. Bulgarians
> speak Slavic language now - and they even think they ARE Slavs. They
> are TURKS!

Please explain why are they not Thracians.

Relevant Pages