Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc
From: grapheus (grapheus_at_www.com)
Date: 03/19/05
- Next message: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Previous message: G Horvat: "Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)"
- In reply to: grapheus2: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Next in thread: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Reply: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Reply: grapheus2: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Mar 2005 14:05:34 -0800
FOR PEOPLE WHO LIKE OUT-OF-THE-SUBJECT POSTS,
here are the TRICKS used by one of J.Faucounau's MAIN SLANDERER :
TRICK n° 1 :
Choose a NICKNAME able to CONFUSE the READERS :
> grapheus2 wrote:
TRICK N° 2 :
REPEAT a LIE, which has been REPEATED AGAIN and AGAIN by yourself and
others :
> There is no doubt that GRAPHEUS and FAUCOUNAU are one and the same
> person.
TRICK n° 3 :
USE ARGUMENTS PROVING NOTHING :
> Only GRAPHEUS and FAUCOUNAU made the some special mistake
> writing the name of the Anistoriton journal.
>
> For FAUCOUNAU see his article in that journal:
> http://www.anistor.co.hol.gr/english/enback/v011.htm.
>
> And for grapheus use the google search function for the groups
archive
> with "ANISTORISTON".)
TRICK n° 4 :
NEVER TRY to demonstrate that the FACTS cited by the other party do not
exist... JUST DENY THEM !
> > NOW, YOU ARE DENYING the ESTABLISHED FACTS !!!! For you, the
script is
> > "Minoan" (but the Disk is UNIQUE) -- the type of Headgear is
"Minoan"
> > (but never represented in the Minoan Art) -- the clay is "Minoan"
(in
> > spite of the contrary analisis made in the 1920ies) -- the seals
are
> > "Minoan" (although not a single one of this type has been found in
> > Crete) -- Etc.
TRICK n° 5 :
ASK AGAIN and AGAIN about "REFERENCES" , BUT NEVER READ THEM !
> It is
> OBVIOUSLY absurd to write about established facts without ANY
> REFERENCE!
TRICK n° 6 :
If the other party, in spite of saying that he will NOT TEACH
IGNARROGANTS, gives you some ELEMENTARY EXPLATIONS, ACCUSE him of
"INTRODUCING a LECTURE" and VEHEMENTLY PROTEST that you are already
well aware of the subject, MAINLY IF YOU IGNORE IT :
> GRAPHEUS TRICK n° 2 : Between two sentences of your opponent,
> introduce a lecture, as he was ignoring even the most elementary
> things of the subject.
TRICK n° 7 :
ASK AGAIN and AGAIN the SAME QUESTIONS, and ACCUSE the other party to
do the same :
>
> GRAPHEUS TRICK n° 3 : Ask again and again the same absurd questions
> which are already answered several times.
TRICK n° 8 :
REPEAT AGAIN and AGAIN the SAME ABSURD REMARK, SUPPORTED BY NOT A
SINGLE FACT :
> there was no need to
> eat in the waste of a destroyed building!
TRICK n° 9 :
IF the REFERENCES of the ORIGINAL WORK have been GIVEN, ASK for SECOND
HAND references :
> > > Where are the references about your articles and that of other
> > > defenders of J.F.s theory?
TRICK n° 10 :
NEVER STOP SENDING MEANINGLESS POSTS to get the last word.
grapheus
- Next message: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Previous message: G Horvat: "Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)"
- In reply to: grapheus2: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Next in thread: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Reply: Alan Crozier: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Reply: grapheus2: "Re: Ancient sky map or fake? German experts row over star disc"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|