Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)
From: Philip Deitiker (Nopdeitik_at_att.net.Spam)
Date: 03/22/05
- Next message: Renia: "Re: of Inger insults, etc."
- Previous message: Matti E Simonaho: "Re: New ancient writing system discovered"
- In reply to: G Horvat: "Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)"
- Next in thread: G Horvat: "Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)"
- Reply: G Horvat: "Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 22 Mar 2005 22:18:22 GMT
In sci.archaeology, G Horvat created a message ID
news:nkf041pkdlh2bcq5qhh1klvaffcshk22ub@4ax.com:
> On 22 Mar 2005 07:44:17 -0800, "Dar Habel" <Dar_83001
@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>G Horvat wrote:
>>> Dar,
>>>
>>> > Surely there are similiarities and differences which can
be
>>compared (?)
>>>
>>> I guess you answered this question while I was writing...
>
>>No, I "dodged" the question. There's enough similarities
and
>>differences in tools and faunal exploitation to discriminate
three or
>>four kinds of adaptation, but like things elsewhere, the
experts
>>disagree on where to draw the lines. For instance, there
must be 10-20
>>(a guess) different tradition/culture/complex
designations/names which
>>have, in past and present, been assigned to sites dated
about 13-10 ka
>>in eastern and western Beringia.
>
> This is where I'm running into a problem as there is,
currently, very
> little genetic variation in the north. How does the "10 -
20" compare
> with other parts of North America - is it because Alaska has
been
> studied more than most parts or is this diversity real? Can
these
> traditions be connected to each other in some way (other
than via
> dates) ? What I am mainly seeing is hundreds or thousands
of bits of
> unconnected information. The descendents of the makers of
the
> Nenana & Denali complexes later made the ....? Dyuktai &
Ushki are
> separated by 10,000 years and archaeologists can see the
similarities.
> Traditions separated by only 1,000 years should be a piece
of cake!
> ;-)
>From and HLA point of view the Inuit population is as variable
as other populations in the region. Certainly they aren't as
variable as the heavily intermixed Japanese.
The Yakuts, I think are one of the least variable in terms
of HLA in the region, it raises the prospect of ancient
enclaves in siberia that did not mix with outsiders well.
Eskimoes however have 2 components, 1 minority is clearly from
western asia and the other resembles other east siberian/north
america haplotypes.
-- Philip - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mol. Anth. Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DNAanthro/ Mol. Evol. Hominids http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/ Evol. of Xchrom. http://home.att.net/~DNAPaleoAnth/xlinked.htm Pal. Anth. Group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Paleoanthro/ Sci. Arch. Aux http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sciarchauxilliary/ DNApaleoAnth at Att dot net
- Next message: Renia: "Re: of Inger insults, etc."
- Previous message: Matti E Simonaho: "Re: New ancient writing system discovered"
- In reply to: G Horvat: "Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)"
- Next in thread: G Horvat: "Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)"
- Reply: G Horvat: "Re: Back-Migrations (was: Siberian Arctic site dated to 27,000 BP)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|