Re: The Vinland Map's Ink



I'm still waiting. Plenty of rhetoric and comments on other topics, but
no answer to my query...

" I would like those who regard the VM as an authentic medieval
document to answer my question ...If the map is really medieval, what
is a PLAUSIBLE explanation for the appearance AND composition of the
inks that is consistent with the age of the parchment?"

It is a really weak answer to argue(?) that we don't really know what
the exact composition of the ink is and therefore we cannot discuss
plausible scenarios. We DO know a number of things and these things
that we DO know have to be placed into a plausible scenario consistent
with a medieval origin.

OK. What do we know NOW that requires plausible explanation?

(1) there is anatase (TiO2) in the ink (but not on the parchment). This
anatase is free of associated clay minerals (XRD, SAED, TEM shows no
clays!) therefore ruling out a "natural" source (unless someone can
PLAUSIBLY explain how a natural trace component clay anatase could have
been completely separated from the clay which is 97% of the sediment)..

(2)The anatase in the ink is a dead-ringer for commercial anatase...not
available until circa 1920.
(3) the ink is NOT an iron-gall ink, which was the standard ink of the
period and which is found (free of titanium!) on the Tartar Relation
and the Speculum Historiale. The experts at the British Museum (e.g.
David Baynes-Cope) found that the VM was unlike any of the many
documents that they had seen.
(4) The ink (as observed today) is a two-component "ink". There is an
underlying yellow-brown material with commercial-grade anatase and an
overlying carbon-based material, much of which has flaked off.

Now, regardless of what the precise composition of the ink is, what
explanation can be offered that will explain all of these four things
and will also be consistent with authenticity?
And, please...no more name-calling, gutter langauage, ad hominem
criticisms, or diversions from this point. Thanks, KEN

.



Relevant Pages

  • Mr Towe libelling
    ... > Repeated requests have been made to those who cling to Vinland Map ... > The Renfors Facts? ... The Cahill PIXE analyses found anatase, not only in the ink ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... >is a PLAUSIBLE explanation for the appearance AND composition of the ... I'm answering this question because I suspect that you regard me as ... >the exact composition of the ink is and therefore we cannot discuss ... >anatase is free of associated clay minerals (XRD, SAED, TEM shows no ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Vinland Map Find Or Fraud?
    ... that has NO RELEVANCE to anything at all being discussed. ... "Anatase particles having all of these properties can only have been ... relevance to the Vinland Map inks." ... content of nanogram flakes of the yellow ink itself, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Vinland Map Find Or Fraud?
    ... > idea as deriving anatase for the VM ink from clays. ... > then appear in an ink on the Vinland Map. ... > anatase without kaolinite is like finding a needle or two in a haystack ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... the ferrous iron begins to oxidize to ferric iron and hematite ... talks about a "leaching process" - quite the opposite from calcining. ... In modern practice, when anatase is ... the association of anatase with a medieval ink ...
    (sci.archaeology)