Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Martyn Harrison <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 16:31:36 GMT
Apparently on date 7 Apr 2005 08:07:57 -0700, "Ken Towe"
<ken.towe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
>Thank you, Tom. I'm still reading alot of bobbing-and-weaving and some
>incredibly misinformed "arguments" and assertions, but no answer to my
>request. If the VM is authentic there must be some rational explanation
>for it. Those who support that point of view are free to use whatever
>sources of information that they feel are valid to explain the
>APPEARANCE and the COMPOSITION of the ink, but so far, I've not seen a
>coherent scenario presented that does this.
That's probably because your request is basically pre-selecting those who want
to believe in the VM and sort of rules out the rest of us who think it is
probably a fake.
In the sense that you're asking the irrational folk for a rational
justification for their position. You get squid ink instead. This should be no
surprise.
If you want cogent arguments you ought to assert a belief in the map and ask
for reasons to think it is fake.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- References:
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Steve Marcus
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Steve Marcus
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Steve Marcus
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Steve Marcus
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Prev by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Previous by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading