Re: The Vinland Map's Ink

David,
you and Ken are making a hugh mistake believing that an assumption from
which you start your argumentation in anyway could and can be used as proof.
What's been done from your side as well as from others who believe the VM to
be a forgery, is to forget that nothing what so ever has been put on the
table which can be used against VM no matter if you refer to anatase - which
exists in same size in nature for example in parts of Norway, outside a
monestry in England as well as in two areas in the Alps close to monestries;
or it's your fictive trying to argue a double ink -
as long as the ink hasn't been identified,
AND
as long as double ink hasn't been proven to exist,
there is no way anyone using scholarly methods can use that against VM!
That's basic argumentation methods limits you are trying to 'walk over'. You
can't.

Inger E


.