Re: The Vinland Map's Ink



Ken Towe wrote:
>
> As usual, more diversions and a blizzard of incorrect statements but
> not a single word to answer the question of how the Vinland Map was
> done if it is a genuine document. Mr. Zahr is correct.
>
> "If the map is authentic, it must be possible to describe the
> process followed to produce it, taking all it's properties
> into account."
>
> Now it is up to those who believe in this map to provide a simple but
> internally consistent scenario. The fact that this has not been done
> speaks volumes. One must suspect that they don't really have any idea
> how to explain it so that it will make sense. Isolated (and
> unreferenced) comments about sand, carbon, etc. are not a scenario.
> Diversion to another topic is not an explanation. Continued criticism
> of previous work or workers is not an explanation.
>
> "If the map is authentic, it must be possible to describe the
> process followed to produce it, taking all it's properties
> into account."
>
> How about it?

Your points have been addressed many times over already For instance
see:

http://tinyurl.com/6l72r



--
SIR - Philosopher unauthorised
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is
misled.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... more diversions and a blizzard of incorrect statements but ... "If the map is authentic, it must be possible to describe the ... internally consistent scenario. ... Diversion to another topic is not an explanation. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Q for sat nav users
    ... and had to map read for a 6 hr round trip. ... several road works with diversions. ... London UK ...
    (uk.people.silversurfers)
  • Re: Id never seen this before
    ... I frequently fly with my wife out here in the mountains, and she will regularly look out at a ridge 50-100 miles away from us when we're cruising at 8500-9500 ft. and say "those mountains look higher than us - are we going to hit them?", or the functional equivalent. ... I glance at the map, say "well, they're 7500 ft high, so we're 1K-2K ft above them, but acknowledge that they DO look higher than our altitude, judging from the horizon position. ... Now I have the explanation for her as to why it looks like it does - thanks! ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Id never seen this before
    ... Ron Wanttaja wrote: ... I frequently fly with my wife out here in the mountains, and she will regularly look out at a ridge 50-100 miles away from us when we're cruising at 8500-9500 ft. and say "those mountains look higher than us - are we going to hit them?", or the functional equivalent. ... I glance at the map, say "well, they're 7500 ft high, so we're 1K-2K ft above them, but acknowledge that they DO look higher than our altitude, judging from the horizon position. ... Now I have the explanation for her as to why it looks like it does - thanks! ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: Map Locations
    ... >>> It does, but aren't the player's coordinates shown on the map now, ... >>> without an addon? ... I just love it when websites have absolutely no explanation about what they ... Prev by Date: ...
    (alt.games.warcraft)