Re: The Vinland Map's Ink

Eric Stevens wrote in message
<5oog51lt02l5q2jb759raf5s5cfnafpu7j@xxxxxxx>...
>
>On Sat, 09 Apr 2005 13:57:56 GMT, "David B" <tronospamchos@xxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>>
>>A variety of plausible scenarios have been developed
>>within the limits of what was possible with known ancient Egyptian
>>technology, and the limits of what we can know without dismantling the
>>pyramid. One of them (or quite probably a combination of elements from
>>several) may be pretty much correct. With the VM, there are no plausible
>>mid-15th-century scenarios at all.
>
>With respect David, a plausible scenario is not necessarily the same
>as knowing the process followed to produce it (whatever 'it' may be).

True, but I must remind you of the question Ken posed:
>>>If the map is really medieval, what is a PLAUSIBLE explanation
>>>for the appearance AND composition of the inks that is consistent
>>>with the age of the parchment? Can Mr. Stevens, Mr. Renfors or
>>>Ms. Johansson answer this question without digressing onto other
>>>topics or making further ad hominem comments?


David B.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... Eric Stevens wrote in message ... ... >>to produce it' wrt the GP, taking all of its properties into ... A variety of plausible scenarios have been developed ... and the limits of what we can know without dismantling the ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Vinland Maps Ink
    ... >Eric Stevens wrote in message ... ... and the limits of what we can know without dismantling the ... as knowing the process followed to produce it. ... If there are several plausible scenarios then, at the most, only one ...
    (sci.archaeology)