Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: "David B" <tronospamchos@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:07:00 GMT
Eric Stevens wrote in message
<40k061psmq73b6j6lu08ogmuhmqccu0fd6@xxxxxxx>...
>
>On 15 Apr 2005 13:19:00 -0700, "Ken Towe" <ken.towe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>>There was a feeling
>>that McCrone may have made some mistakes (which he did) and that was
>>part of the reason that Cahill et al. were retained by Yale to
>>reevaluate the Map using a different approach.
>
>It wasn't that it was thought that he had made a mistake but that
>there were practical limits to what he could achieve with optical
>microscopy.
Ermmm, Eric-
Ken is the actual person who was initially called upon to check whether the
McCrone team could possibly have made significant mistakes...
David B.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- References:
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Alaca
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Steve Marcus
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: David B.
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Prev by Date: Re: The Nature of Anatase...
- Next by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Previous by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|