Re: Anatase TiO2
- From: "I.E_Johansson" <IEJohansson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 15:37:07 GMT
Forgot to say that this was what 15-17 year old students learnt in
1880's.... and as I wrote below we had an other name for it, which might be
one of the reason for confussion among some here:
"titansyra"
"Titansyra TiO2 : tetragonal såsom rutil och anatas, rhombisk
ss. Brookit."
http://runeberg.org/mineral/0064.html
Inger E
"I.E_Johansson" <IEJohansson@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:Mx99e.22244$d5.163195@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> It's also been nice to learn that some still tries to maintain the image
> that anatase TiO2 wasn't known before industrialproduction of anatase came
> in progress..... The name might have been changed over the years but TiO2
> was known in 1880, not 1886 as I (and others) assumed from International
> Encyclopedia's lines....
>
> In 1880 Anton Sjögren edited Lärobok i Mineralogi för elementar-läroverk
och
> tekniska skolor.....
> http://runeberg.org/mineral/0074.html
>
> Inger E
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anatase TiO2
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Anatase TiO2
- References:
- Anatase TiO2
- From: I.E_Johansson
- Anatase TiO2
- Prev by Date: Anatase TiO2
- Next by Date: Re: Anatase present in many Ancient artifacts as well
- Previous by thread: Anatase TiO2
- Next by thread: Re: Anatase TiO2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|