Re: More anatase

Seppo Renfors wrote:

"the majority of soils worldwide contain < 1% titanium. This is
usually in the form of anatase, brookite, rutile, ilmenite, or sphene.
Quantities of up to 25% (TiO2) have been reported..."


My god but you are DRIVEN liar Renforz. You even carefully snipped the full quotation that was above this snip because it contained facts you could not deal with.

Here it is again:

"The occurrence of titanium minerals in soils is generally minor. Estimations of amounts vary; the majority of soils worldwide contain < 1% titanium. This is usually in the form of anatase, brookite, rutile, ilmenite, or sphene. Quantities of up to 25% (TiO2) have been reported for certain size fractions from Hawaiian soils (Sherman, 1952). Significant quantities have also been reported in the A horizons of peaty Podzols from Ireland and Scotland (Bain, 1976)."


Now I know from long experience that dealing with you requires a cascading logic chain that goes something like:-

"Materials handling methodology for Seppo Babble"

Is it an outright lie, fabrication or invention [Yes/No]?

If "no", was it plagiarised  [Yes/No]?

Once genuine source found, has Seppo re-edited, selectively (mis)quoted, or simply misunderstood [Yes/No]?

In each instance, the "drop option" is to simply then ignore the "Seppo Babble".

In this case what could possibly be a simple misunderstanding of English on Seppo's part (he does after all have problems understanding English) is obviously something more pathological as he has cut or ignored the relevant bit of this quotation which causes it to not in any way support the meaning Seppo wants to ascribe to it on a number of occasions.

That bit being:- "Quantities of up to 25% (TiO2) have been reported for certain size fractions from Hawaiian soils (Sherman, 1952)."

Contrary to the meaning Renforz needs this to have, i.e. that 25% of certain Hawaiian soils are TiO2, it actually means that in certain component particle sizes of the relevant soil TiO2 represents up to 25% of the whole of that particle size.

It is akin to claiming that a sentence like "25% of all division 1 lotto winners are millionaires" means that in fact 25% of all people are millionaires. Typical Seppony, nothing more.


That he continues to return, like a dog to its vomit, to this particular phrase means one of two possible things.

1/. Seppo (the clown TM) is a fabricative, liar and further debate on this or any other topic would be better served by ignoring his input.

2/. Seppo (the clown TM) has such a low standard of English comprehension that it does not understand the material it attempts to bring in for its "arguments". In which case further debate on this or other topics could be best served by simply ignoring his input.

To be truthful, given my own experience with Renfors and having seen his capacity to lie, steal, misrepresent, plagiarise etc. I actually go for a combination of both, he does have a pitiful level of English comprehension and he does deliberately mis-represent, lie, forge, fabricate etc. Proof of which has been posted on a number of occasions.

In any event, it is of no matter as the necessary prescription is the same in both circumstances.



You really need to stay with it Tom. It shoots a massive hole in Ken's
bogus claims - hell, even HE has recognised it judging from his
hissy-fit. Perhaps you too have realised it and that is why you too
are having a hissy-fit??

Most people's "hissy fits" when dealing with Renforz are the result of being exposed to the full depth of its asinine stupidity.


May I suggest that the group make a collective decision to consign Renforz and the various socks he employs from time to time to the bozo bin, idiot filter, twit filter, ignore list or whatever your individual news client uses and simply stop responding to him or Inger for that matter.

The blunt truth is that if you go back over, say the last year, most of the bandwidth of this group is taken up, one way or the other, in dealing with the inanities raised by one or the other of them.

Let them post into a silent vacuum and see how long their interest in continuing to infest this group remains. Then perhaps some serious discussions, more worthy of a sci. hierarchy group could happen.




Tony Smith

.