Re: More anatase

Seppo Renfors wrote: 

Tom McDonald wrote:

I.E_Johansson wrote:

"The occurrence of titanium minerals in soils is generally minor.
Estimations of amounts vary; the majority of soils worldwide contain < 1%
titanium. This is usually in the form of anatase, brookite, rutile,
ilmenite, or sphene. Quantities of up to 25% (TiO2) have been reported for
certain size fractions from Hawaiian soils (Sherman, 1952). Significant
quantities have also been reported in the A horizons of peaty Podzols from
Ireland and Scotland (Bain, 1976)."

http://www.iti.northwestern.edu/publications/tdr/1994_papers/titan.html

Inger E 

Johansson,

Don't give us this bull***.


You just don't understand the issues. 

Seppo,

	No, in this case you have that honor.

It contradicts Ken's bogus claim
of a universal maximum content of 1 -> 5% of anatase in nature.

In clays. You and your lady love have been imagining that any mention of anatase anywhere at any time in any context is germane to this discussion. It's gotta be the blue balls. You should really take care of that.

The
site clearly states:
"the majority of soils worldwide contain < 1% titanium. This is
usually in the form of anatase, brookite, rutile, ilmenite, or sphene.
Quantities of up to 25% (TiO2) have been reported..."


	In soils in general. Not clays in particular. Please try to keep up.


You really need to stay with it Tom. It shoots a massive hole in Ken's
bogus claims - hell, even HE has recognised it judging from his
hissy-fit.

You've spectacularly lost the thread. Perhaps, if you weren't so fanatically looking for ways to make yourself and your lady love look less obviously wrong-headed, you might pick it up again.

Perhaps you too have realised it and that is why you too
are having a hissy-fit??


	That's comedy, Seppo.


BTW, what happened to your promise of killfiling Inger - got too
lonely for you, no females for you to abuse, eh? Perhaps this is just
an opportunity for you to engage in your "hobby", your sole reason for
living - abusing Inger.


	Again, you've lost the thread and have failed to keep up.

I killfiled her, and followed her nym-changes through six or eight iterations. I finally gave up, and decided that if she was that dedicated to avoiding killfiles (and to learning better ways to secure herself online), I'd let her drivel (or dravel, which I'm sure is the correct Brittish English) back onto my screen. I mentioned this at the time, and I'd thought you'd taken that opportunity to demean yourself again. Maybe I'm wrong; or maybe you've forgotten. The better chance, though, is that you find it satisfying to bring this chestnut up again now.

Johansson abuses herself, us and this newsgroup on a regular basis. She could rid herself of 99% of her problems on this ng if she would participate in a normal, reasonable, productive manner. She does not. You do once in a while, but have recently gone off the rails again.

	You're here for the abuse. It's two doors down, on the right.

--
Tom McDonald
http://ahwhatdoiknow.blogspot.com/
.

Loading