Re: Trol

Tom McDonald wrote:  2ir9e.4889$Ah5.3250@xxxxxxxx,

Alaca wrote:
Alan Crozier wrote:

That particular detail may have been changed to suit the thread


Sorry Alan but here you are 100% wrong. There are many more
sources than Dutch speaking scholars, no matter archaeology or
history normally knows about. I take it that you haven't read
Imperial Flanders message today 05,21 PM? Haven't seen you there
anytime btw so you obviously haven't read what one who knows these
things say in discussion. What you showed in your argumentation against
my capability of understanding is that you aren't prepared to take a
discussion where you need to put forward arguments supporting your
claim. Either you can or you can't. I am not the only one here who
thinks that an archaeologists needs good knowledge about a period's
written sources, given that there exist such, to be able to interpret
correctly. Your problem not mine!!!!

Be careful, Peter; your mind might freeze like that! :-) 

Tom,
stop lying!!!! You needn't be so offensive and abusive. Yes you are.
Either you are blind or you can't read Flemish. I can present proof
for every single statement I made, those who have seen them have
accepted them. I have presented proof many of the proof I have
even if I haven't done it so you could see it.
Before you continue your funny comments - I don't care if you are
with me or not - but don't tell lies when your sitting with bad cards
in your hand, you never know what's in the other person's hand - nor
do you know anything what so ever of the proofs that exist.
Apart from that only those who haven't done their homework would
EVER use the word mind when it's quality that needs all background
information to be known, read and analyzed by anyone who like to
be able to draw valid conclusions. That's nothing that can be done
as easily as you seem to believe. Without taking yourself time to
doing that you have no rights what so ever to presume that my mind
might freeze!!!!!

--
- Peter Alaca - Copycat unauthorised






.

Loading