Re: Trol

"Tedd Jacobs" <Jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> says in
news:d46d2a0i7k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

>
> "Alaca" wrote...
>> Philip Deitiker wrote: Xns963E7CE7A576Cprd@xxxxxxxxxxxx,
>>
>>> Alaca created
>>>> Michael Hopper wrote:
>>
>>>>> You missed putting your response ahead of the original. You
>>>>> have some way to go to imitate the Swedish original.
>>
>>>> Help, criticism! :-(
>>>> Better start six new threads now.
>>>
>>> Yes, Include peoples names in the Title as this Increases your
>>> credibility:
>>>
>>> Attn Doug: My English am right youse beed wrong.
>>> Attn Ken: My scholars are more scholarly than yours.
>>> Anser to Tom: I writed thar defrinition of abuse for all of
>>> Sweden.
>>> Warning Stalkers: Restauration is not as fast a food as you
>>> think.
>>> Anatase present in my sneakers, and in the sand between my
>>> toes.
>>> VM map not a fake, my grandfather drewed so he could knowed.
>>
>> Philip and Tedd,
>> No I will not. AND No you wouldn't have had you been me, you
>> haven't seen all the cards nor do you know who of persons
>> writing here and persons reading this I have been discussing
>> this from our different knowledge for years + you don't know
>> when and why I take up this or that. It's a very very planned
>> schedule. And apart from the idiotic personal attacks from
>> those who aren't willing to present one single source
>> themselves nor reading the Prime sources no matter if I write
>> exact page or not, apart from them I receive positive response
>> because I am dyslextic one way or the other. Which means that I
>> have spelling problems. Which I told you and other about many
>> times. I can write lawtexts and official texts and other such
>> texts without any problems but writing for example an ordinary
>> novel or a short story not related to facts isn't my cup of
>> tea. This I owe a retired Prof from Minnesota who presented me
>> with the idea presented few days ago.
>> I will not continue discussing absurd assumptions from you
>> because neither of you have been able to present one single
>> valid argument. Nor have you been able to ask the single
>> question that any scholar, no matter which type of degree,
>> position and subject, should have asked.
>>
>> --
>> - Peter Alaca - Copycat unauthorised
>
> i dont know whether to laugh or cry.

I think a few tears are in order for the Swedish
educational system.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Trol
    ... Philip Deitiker wrote: ... My scholars are more scholarly than yours. ... have spelling problems. ... I can write lawtexts and official texts and other such ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Trol
    ... My scholars are more scholarly than yours. ... positive response because I am dyslextic one way or the other. ... Which means that I have spelling problems. ... I can write lawtexts and official texts and ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Trol
    ... > Tedd Jacobs wrote: d46d2a0i7k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ... >>> positive response because I am dyslextic one way or the other. ... >>> Which means that I have spelling problems. ... I can write lawtexts and official texts and ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Trol
    ... My scholars are more scholarly than yours. ... positive response because I am dyslextic one way or the other. ... Which means that I have spelling problems. ... I can write lawtexts and official texts and ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Trol
    ... My scholars are more scholarly than yours. ... And apart from the idiotic personal attacks from those who aren't willing to present one single source themselves nor reading the Prime sources no matter if I write exact page or not, apart from them I receive positive response because I am dyslextic one way or the other. ... Which means that I have spelling problems. ... I can write lawtexts and official texts and other such texts without any problems but writing for example an ordinary novel or a short story not related to facts isn't my cup of tea. ...
    (sci.archaeology)