Re: Scholars and Theory of Science former Re: The Vinland Map's Ink

"Ken Towe" <ken.towe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1114525383.625585.145550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

> Well, if Ms. Johansson is unwilling or unable to answer questions that
> are raised directly as a result of her own assertions and theories then
> there is no reason for anyone to continue a dialog with her. Nor is
> there any reason why anyone reading her material should give it any
> consideration at all. One would be completely justified in ignoring
> her.
>
> Would she accept a theory that a famous professor in Denmark has
> assured us that he was told by an Austrian monk that a solid anatase
> runestone (formed at 800°C from an Alpine sand on a Viking-brand
stove
> in Minneapolis) is a doorstop at the Yale Beinecke Library and when it
> was used to block open the doors the dust from this stone wafted into
> the air and landed on the Vinland Map? Maybe she would! After all it
> makes as much sense as some of her stories.

Oh, great. Now a year or two from now, she'll "quote" this statement as
proof there was a source of anatase contamination at Yale...

I probably told you early, but it's best to just assume:

"Inger Said it = Wrong."

In spite of her statements claiming to be a "scholar," she has no actual
conception of how to do research, how science actually works, or even
how to give a simple reference.

In spite of her statements claiming to have been involved in the
invention of half of modern computing, she shows no evidence she actually
understands _anything_ about what goes on in that little beige-box
sitting next to her, having made wildly incorrect statements about
virus's, email, the usenet, operating systems...and apparently not even
knowing the difference between a bmp and jpg image file.

Her statements in biology, linguistics, English, Latin, history and -
indeed - every _other_ subject she has chosen to pontificate about here
have all at one time or another (or, more often, repeatedly) been proven
to be mistakes, misunderstandings, lies, or just otherwise wrong.

She is mentally incapable (and you could end the statement there...) of
admitting a mistake, _more_ than capable of just making stuff up (and
probably delusional enough to actually thereafter believe the stuff she
made up) and as far as I can tell incapable of reading for comprehension
in _any_ known language, including her own.

Just killfile the woman.

David

--
David Johnson http://home.earthlink.net/~trolleyfan
"You're a loony, you are!"
"They said that about Galileo, they said that about Einstein..."
"Yeah, and they said it about a good few loonies, too

Remove "_nospam" to email
.

Relevant Pages