Re: More anatase



Tom McDonald wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors wrote:
> >
> > Tom McDonald wrote:
> >
> >>I.E_Johansson wrote:
> >>
> >>>"The occurrence of titanium minerals in soils is generally minor.
> >>>Estimations of amounts vary; the majority of soils worldwide contain < 1%
> >>>titanium. This is usually in the form of anatase, brookite, rutile,
> >>>ilmenite, or sphene. Quantities of up to 25% (TiO2) have been reported for
> >>>certain size fractions from Hawaiian soils (Sherman, 1952). Significant
> >>>quantities have also been reported in the A horizons of peaty Podzols from
> >>>Ireland and Scotland (Bain, 1976)."
> >>>
> >>>http://www.iti.northwestern.edu/publications/tdr/1994_papers/titan.html
> >>>
> >>>Inger E
> >>
> >>Johansson,
> >>
> >> Don't give us this bull***.
> >
> >
> > You just don't understand the issues.
>
> Seppo,
>
> No, in this case you have that honor.

*sigh*..... you can't even get that much right! If it was in my case,
then at least you would have spelled it right .....shheeeeezz!
>
> > It contradicts Ken's bogus claim
> > of a universal maximum content of 1 -> 5% of anatase in nature.
>
> In clays.

....and "soils" doesn't include clays? Further more KEN points to
sources other than clays for his universal claim of occurrence of
anatase - materials belonging to the group MICA!! HE has no proof of
his claim being true at all - only plain old flim-flam of a snake oil
salesman, nothing more.

On the other hand, Inger keeps rolling them out as she has in her
thread "Anatase Myth"....

> You and your lady love have been imagining that any
> mention of anatase anywhere at any time in any context is germane
> to this discussion. It's gotta be the blue balls. You should
> really take care of that.

Well come on smart-arse - provide PROOF of the universality of the
claim Ken makes that kaolinite NEVER contains more than between 1 ->
5% anatase. Till then we need NOT prove anything - even though we have
done.

BTW, you don't HAVE any balls at all irrespective of colour -
otherwise your "hobby" wouldn't be beating up on women the other side
of the world, while hiding behind a computer screen!

> > The
> > site clearly states:
> > "the majority of soils worldwide contain < 1% titanium. This is
> > usually in the form of anatase, brookite, rutile, ilmenite, or sphene.
> > Quantities of up to 25% (TiO2) have been reported..."
>
> In soils in general.

....which is what the "contain < 1% titanium" refers to, not to what
follows "Quantities".

> Not clays in particular.

....but specially NOT "soils in general" as you claimed, further to
that it is NOT excluding clays as you try to imply.

> Please try to keep up.

Please do try and read with comprehension in mind. You really are not
doing too well, you know.

> > You really need to stay with it Tom. It shoots a massive hole in Ken's
> > bogus claims - hell, even HE has recognised it judging from his
> > hissy-fit.
>
> You've spectacularly lost the thread. Perhaps, if you weren't so
> fanatically looking for ways to make yourself and your lady love
> look less obviously wrong-headed, you might pick it up again.

You your jealousy slip is showing Tom - your continual reference to
"your lady love" is just that!

> > Perhaps you too have realised it and that is why you too
> > are having a hissy-fit??
>
> That's comedy, Seppo.

Sadly you may actually believe that and act accordingly - the rest of
the world would call your hissy-fits as "abuse".

> > BTW, what happened to your promise of killfiling Inger - got too
> > lonely for you, no females for you to abuse, eh? Perhaps this is just
> > an opportunity for you to engage in your "hobby", your sole reason for
> > living - abusing Inger.
>
> Again, you've lost the thread and have failed to keep up.

Wake up! It wasn't part of the thread!

> I killfiled her, and followed her nym-changes through six or
> eight iterations. I finally gave up, and decided that if she was
> that dedicated to avoiding killfiles (and to learning better ways
> to secure herself online), I'd let her drivel (or dravel, which
> I'm sure is the correct Brittish English) back onto my screen. I
> mentioned this at the time, and I'd thought you'd taken that
> opportunity to demean yourself again. Maybe I'm wrong; or maybe
> you've forgotten. The better chance, though, is that you find it
> satisfying to bring this chestnut up again now.

[Seppo rubs forefinger against thumb] You know what that is? The
world's smallest violin!

In case you fail to understand - it is the annoying squealing sound of
the insincere petty person! You know very well that you had the
ability to killfile her - only you just salivated over the "excuse"
you had to re-engage in your favourite hobby. You are another of those
who blames the victim for the crimes you commit against the victim -
just read that *** below!
>
> Johansson abuses herself,

THERE IT IS! You accusing the victim of your own crimes! The "She MADE
be abuse her" argument!!

> .....us and this newsgroup on a regular
> basis. She could rid herself of 99% of her problems on this ng if
> she would participate in a normal, reasonable, productive manner.
> She does not. You do once in a while, but have recently gone off
> the rails again.
>
> You're here for the abuse.

Aha, is that so.... I come here for the undoubted privilege of being
abused by Tom (the empty) McDonald!! Do you suffer a lot from nose
bleeds?!

> It's two doors down, on the right.

....but you need BOTH doors open together to just get your head trough
the opening!

--
Petty Criminal Stalkers need not reply
http://tinyurl.com/d2h2u
.

Loading