Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase
Ken Towe wrote: 1114699686.735180.56760@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
[...]
I have requested
several times that those who advocate a natural source offer an
explanation for how their natural anatase could be so completely
separated from the bulk of the material with which it is found and yet
appear as seen on the Map. So far, they have not done so. Until they
do so most people will see immediately that their "explanation" (=
it's found in nature!) is laughable. Based on past performance, we
need not expect them to provide anything but more fog and more heat,
but no light.
But ten days ago Inger gave - after carefull research of course -
an excelent explanation ;-)
"" Alaca, if you didn't know it, which you obviously don't the pens
which were used to write and draw lines in Medieval Age
more than once were placed back in pottery-vessels after
being used.
Apart from that the Anatase present in pottery from Ancient
to Medieval Age has been presented to be in same range
and forms as on VM.
If you don't see the significance, well others do. ""
--
- Peter Alaca -
.
