Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase

Apparently on date 28 Apr 2005 15:23:20 -0700, bogart.lloy@xxxxxxxxx said:

>Ken Towe wrote:
>[snip]
>
>Charring the partially cleaned intestines and
>slinging the reduced, blown smoke residue, as
>described above, would accomplish the transfer
>of only the very tiniest anatase particles to the
>ink pot where it might remain, along with some
>carbon and very little else).
>
>After that, the stuff might easily, but accidently,
>have been mistaken for ink, for one stunning project,
>and THAT's why only a single document appears
>to exist, on which this 'ink' was utilized.
>
>Whew! I hope you followed all that, and I'm
>already confident of your agreement that this is
>just (precisely) what happened. If you don't,
>you're just (merely) wrong!

This is the best explanation for the VM authenticity so far, but I think it
will merely prove that KT, you me and anyone else has not done their homework
and is, instead, promulgating sexabuse.

Oh, er... --> ;)


.