Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase

bogart.lloy@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
1114786638.874501.54070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,

Alaca wrote:
[snip]

(to Eric)

OK, let's try another way

 " Taking a Popperian approach, the main reason that
    I am prepared to entertain the idea that " Lloyd Bogart's
    story "may be authentic is that, in my opinion, it has not yet
    been convincingly shown to be a fake. "

In short: you are not Lloyd Bogart unless you can prove you are,
and if youn can, you are still a liar, because you made the story up.
And regardless of the author, there was no necessity to tell it was
a joke. If it was, you spoiled it; if it wasn't, you offended Lloyd.

--
- Peter Alaca -


I would lke to assure all and sundry that I am NOT offended
by what Eric posted.


That's your problem, not mine.

 My interpretation, which is nessarily
correct because it's mine, mine, mine,  is that Eric was alerting
us to the fact that *his own* elaboration (the goldbeater thingy)
was a joke.  (However, if we find examples of repaired parchments
which show traces of gold, we'll know who to thank.)


But Eric wrote "what I wrote above is joke",
but above was what you wrote! That is making
himself a plagiatrist.

Those folks who read this newsgroup to revel in the abuse and
offensive exchanges will, of course, be disappointed in this.


My Sub-Rosa Source <tm> emailed me at 2:00 A.M. Central
Standard Time (USA) to caution me.  I'd said the "stuff" that
ended up in the inkpot was used as a medicine.  She tells me now
that it may have been used either as a type of eyeshadow or
as component of a *very* fine abrasive paste.  I  cannot imagine
why religious acolytes would require eyeshadow, but others here
may be more imaginative.


As so many times before you slip into a discussion on
a banana-skin trying to infame me in saying that I am
imaginative. What I find hard to belive is that we have many
scholars here who seem to be unaware that your "very fine
abrasive past" is exactly same as the lubricant which have
been found in dated layer in north-east Twin City Minnesota.
And btw I sent you full ref to that five years ago including
name of the archaeologist in question. Layers dated to
Pre-Columbian age more exactly to mid 14th century found
in nature. Merdieval aconites are using it since 1430's onwards
one way or the other.

I realize that my previous post takes the form of an unsubstantiated
assertion, and expect it to be given the same attention as all the
other such offerings we see here -- I'm anticipating 400 or so follow-
up postings.

Regarding the ability of others to prove that they are Lloyd Bogart,
please do so if you can.  I'm awaiting a flood of students who need
individual help with research projects today, and a few more of me
would come in 'real handy'.  ;-)

Regards


Lloyd
*****


--
P.A. (CC)

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Reflecting
    ... We do what we can when we can, Lloyd. ... I hate to imagine all the "out ... of towners" we've hooked up with, and they've all been really great ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase
    ... >> I am prepared to entertain the idea that " Lloyd Bogart's ... I cannot imagine ... > why religious acolytes would require eyeshadow, ... > and a few more of me would come in 'real handy'. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase
    ... >> I am prepared to entertain the idea that " Lloyd Bogart's ... If it was, you spoiled it; if it wasn't, you offended Lloyd. ... I cannot imagine ... >why religious acolytes would require eyeshadow, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase
    ... Alaca wrote: ... > I am prepared to entertain the idea that " Lloyd Bogart's ... I cannot imagine ... why religious acolytes would require eyeshadow, ...
    (sci.archaeology)