Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase

bogart.lloy@xxxxxxxxx says in
news:1114786638.874501.54070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

>
> Alaca wrote:
> [snip]
>
> (to Eric)
>
>> OK, let's try another way
>>
>> " Taking a Popperian approach, the main reason that
>> I am prepared to entertain the idea that " Lloyd Bogart's
>> story "may be authentic is that, in my opinion, it has not
>> yet been convincingly shown to be a fake. "
>>
>> In short: you are not Lloyd Bogart unless you can prove you
>> are, and if youn can, you are still a liar, because you made
>> the story up. And regardless of the author, there was no
>> necessity to tell it was a joke. If it was, you spoiled it; if
>> it wasn't, you offended Lloyd.
>>
>> --
>> - Peter Alaca -
>
> I would lke to assure all and sundry that I am NOT offended
> by what Eric posted. My interpretation, which is neessarily
> correct because it's mine, mine, mine, is that Eric was
> alerting us to the fact that *his own* elaboration (the
> goldbeater thingy) was a joke. (However, if we find examples of
> repaired parchments which show traces of gold, we'll know who to
> thank.)
>
> Those folks who read this newsgroup to revel in the abuse and
> offensive exchanges will, of course, be disappointed in this.

Deeply disappointed since one really expects offensive exchanges
in the forth incarnation of a thread that was acedemically dead
a month ago.

> My Sub-Rosa Source <tm> emailed me at 2:00 A.M. Central
> Standard Time (USA) to caution me.

The best sources of information, as you know, occur at 3 A.M. in the
dimension of the fouth incarnation.

> I'd said the "stuff" that
> ended up in the inkpot was used as a medicine.

Was the VM map sick?

> She tells me now
> that it may have been used either as a type of eyeshadow or
> as component of a *very* fine abrasive paste. I cannot imagine
> why religious acolytes would require eyeshadow, but others here
> may be more imaginative.

They dress up and sneak out on weekends for carnal pleasures.

> I realize that my previous post takes the form of an
> unsubstantiated assertion, and expect it to be given the same
> attention as all the other such offerings we see here -- I'm
> anticipating 400 or so follow- up postings.

OK, Im number 3. Yippee!

> Regarding the ability of others to prove that they are Lloyd
> Bogart, please do so if you can. I'm awaiting a flood of
> students who need individual help with research projects today,
> and a few more of me would come in 'real handy'. ;-)

Real 'handy' didn't work back then,
thats why they had the makeup.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase
    ... She tells me now that it may have been used either as a type of eyeshadow or as component of a *very* fine abrasive paste. ... I cannot imagine why religious acolytes would require eyeshadow, but others here may be more imaginative. ... What I find hard to belive is that we have many scholars here who seem to be unaware that your "very fine abrasive past" is exactly same as the lubricant which have been found in dated layer in north-east Twin City Minnesota. ... Regarding the ability of others to prove that they are Lloyd Bogart, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Reflecting
    ... We do what we can when we can, Lloyd. ... I hate to imagine all the "out ... of towners" we've hooked up with, and they've all been really great ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase
    ... Alaca wrote: ... > I am prepared to entertain the idea that " Lloyd Bogart's ... I cannot imagine ... why religious acolytes would require eyeshadow, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: More anatase myth killing. Re: More anatase
    ... >> I am prepared to entertain the idea that " Lloyd Bogart's ... If it was, you spoiled it; if it wasn't, you offended Lloyd. ... I cannot imagine ... >why religious acolytes would require eyeshadow, ...
    (sci.archaeology)