Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2005 22:03:24 +1200
On 2 May 2005 21:19:17 GMT, Philip Deitiker <Nopdeitik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>In sci.archaeology, Ken Towe created a message ID
>news:1115045326.061789.55370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> I would not disagree at all. You have expressed this very
>well, both
>> here and in your following post. I suspect Mr. Stevens will
>be too busy
>> with his many other projects to agree or disagree with you.
>After all,
>> if he did so he would then have taken an actual position on
>something,
>> and he doesn't seem willing to do that.
>
>There you go. And with that we need to move on from this
>VM map.
>
>Summary-
> The mdm refuses to accept any evidence of fraud concerning
>articles that supports broader familiarity of Vinland in 15th
>century as fraudulent no matter what the evidence.
> Eric refuses to take a position, while admitting there is no
>evidence that it was a 15th century map,
Read for context. I have never said that.
> ... he refuses to close
>the door on the fact that it was authentic to a later period,
>possibly the bristol period.
>
>Of course there are a gazillion other archaeological topics
>worth discussion, but this seems to be the obsession of a few.
>Realizing this is an area of your expertise but this is more
>about antiquity and history than it is about archaeology.
>
Eric Stevens
.
- References:
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Prev by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Previous by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading