Re: The Vinland Map's Ink


"Eric Stevens" <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jlnf71lmtgrqivf9fpjudrg6nm4k59ui3h@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Tue, 03 May 2005 12:26:54 GMT, "David B" <tronospamchos@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>Eric Stevens wrote in message ...
>>>
>>>I have today spent 15 hours visting a small obscure
>>>town some 300 miles away from where I live and examining physical
>>>evidence which eventually will lead me to a conclusion which I can
>>>support IN DETAIL.
>>
>>Can you distinguish natural occurrences from sabotage / misuse with 100%
>>certainty?
>>
>>
> A hypothetical question which will receive the hypothetical answer -
> yes I can, if I have enough information.
>
> Usually I don't have enough information but what I don't know usually
> tells me where to look for what is missing. There is no guarantee I
> will find it.
LOL

How will you ever *know* that you have all the information??

I'll answer the question myself: You'll *know* that you have all the
information when the information reaches a conclusion that you or your
client (not necessarily the same thing) want to reach. And don't we all
just *know* that you quite often go back to a client and say "Sorry, all the
available evidence points to X conclusion, but there may just be more out
there and I can't write my report until that evidence surfaces (if it ever
does)."

Once again, LOL.

It's the same game that you play on sci.archaeology. Which is why I *know*
that you aren't being at all truthful regarding the methodology with which
you claim to conduct your business.
>
>
>
> Eric Stevens
>

Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: KRS - Possible news to come
    ... are told that only part of the evidence will be disclosed, ... people know all the evidence (like you, Inger) while others will have to ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Iron Pyrite...
    ... which you have been assiduously evading ever since. ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ... > Eric Stevens ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Vineland
    ... The ink has been dated. ... > Eric Stevens ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: KRS - Possible news to come
    ... > Like all of your arguments, this one is riddled with holes where the ... > evidence should be. ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Old story walking again.
    ... >>theorists could imagine a conspiracy isn't evidence. ... > Do you mean to say the reports of finding evidence of a Roman wreck ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)