Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: bogart.lloy@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 May 2005 11:03:40 -0700
bogart.l...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Ken Towe *[ACTUALLY DAVID] wrote:
> > Few things are truly certain, but in the absence of any
> > hypotheses for a medieval origin of the Vinland Map ink
> > which do not require a multiplicity of remarkable
> > circumstances,
>
> [snip]
> >
> > Mr. Stevens wrote...
> >
> >> I take no issue with this. [??? >>>>] Even including
> >> item (1) in your list, you have told us nothing about
> >> the actual ink. You have instead told us about the
> >> anatase present in the ink. This no more tells us
> >> anything useful about the ink than would an account
> >> of mud found in the wheel arches tell you anything
> >> useful about my car.
>
>
> Ken Towe wrote...
> > Using this logic(?) wouldn't one have to argue similarly
> > that in item (1) [th e ink used to draw the Vinland Map is
> > not an iron gall ink] the presence (or absence) of iron tells
> > us nothing useful about the actual ink?
>
> Appaarently, Eric remains convinced that the anatase is an
> after-the-fact addition to the VM: if, l ike the mud on his car,
> the anatase were to be magically removed, it would not alter
> the integrity of what remained -- it would still be "the ink".
>
> Otherwise, if the anatase is a component of the "ink", then,
> and by extension, it follows that i f we knew *everything*
> that's *in* the VM ink, that'd still not tell us anything
> useful about the ink.
>
> Or, we might wonder how many remaining components
> might be removed before what remains is classified as
> something other than "the ink"?
>
> **********
>
> Following up on an earlier posting, I refer those still fascinated
> by the anatase debacle (all none of you, I suspect) to co nsider:
>
> http://www.tms.org/Meetings/Annual-97/Program/AM97-TuesdayPM.html
>
> ...in which is summarize d a method for generating very small
> and uniformTi02 particles from a heated source. For those
> impaired enough to be habitually credulous, it will be only a
> short hop to the realization that the BBISB&ARS <tm> method
> (Bovine Burned Intestine, Smoke Blowing & Acolyte Residue
> Slinging method) should not be ignored.
>
> Gotta go now, my tongue seems to be painfully lodged in
> my cheek.
>
>
> Lloyd
> *****
>
> .
Apologies for the mis-attribution, that *beginning* statement
wes David's, as *quoted* by Ken.
i
.
- References:
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: David B
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Steve Marcus
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: David B.
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: David B
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: David B
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: bogart . lloy
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Prev by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Previous by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|