Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Seppo Renfors <Renfors@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 08:32:09 GMT
Tom McDonald wrote:
>
> Seppo Renfors wrote:
> >
> > "I.E_Johansson" wrote:
> >
> >>Seppo,
> >>since when is it a threat to Tom to realise that he is wrong, because that's
> >>the only threat I could be to him when presenting the facts there is in the
> >>Vinland Map's Ink case. Btw. I have been waiting to send part 5 of
> >>Greenland, Vinland and Vinland Map to the group. Too long including
> >>archaeology, written history and a geneologic part which explains what
> >>happened from 1053 to 1600's.... guess facts will be to hard a meal to take
> >>for Tom.
> >
> >
> > Well.... you know how it is, poor Tom has no other life than abuse
> > people on usenet specially you - therefor you must be a threat to him
> > and his sensitivities, or should that be "fantasies".
> >
>
> Oh, Seppo, mo run, ma cheri,
>
> If I didn't exist, you'd have to invent me. In fact, the 'me'
> you react to pretty much *is* an invention of yours.
Aha..... and I bet you can't even prove you exist, if it comes to that
:-)
> As for real evidence, I have nothing to fear. I don't hold any
> opinion about archaeology to be sacrosanct;
The hell you don't!!
> if the evidence is
> there to show my current opinion to be untenable, I'll gladly
> give it up.
The evidence is out there to say you have NOTHING to contribute - in
other than stalking Inger and abusing her (or me).
See:
http://tinyurl.com/8r7fv
80% of your replies are either abusive or off topic on that first page
alone - but only ONE was actually meaningful.
On the second page only ONE post had anything of interest - you
thanked Inger!! However at the same time 50% of the posts were attacks
on Inger - the rest were attacks on others or off topic.
But then if one adds another criteria for the search we get this:
http://tinyurl.com/cuqg4
Again on the first page there is 80% of attacking people - of that you
attack Inger 60% of the time, and some are part of the usual pack
attacks you participate in.
Is that enough evidence for you?
> The problem with the Mrs., and too often with you, is
> that the evidence coming from the two of you is so often (not
> always) only impressive to you. Give me better evidence and
> better arguments on a regular basis, and I think you'd see my
> reaction to you change for the better.
Given that you prefer unsupported conspiracy theories, fantasy and
fiction whenever something crosses your long established dogma, then
it is indeed impossible to provide "better evidence" or even "better
arguments" - as you find ALL of the aforementioned NOT supporting that
well established dogma of yours as "unimpressive" to you.
>
> I'll not hold my breath on that, though.
Your "approval" is NOT a requirement to post, you know - nor is the
LACK of your approval any kind of "justification" for you to resorting
to abuse!
--
http://tinyurl.com/al225
http://tinyurl.com/alznw
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Alaca
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- References:
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: David B
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Steve Marcus
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: David B.
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Eric Stevens
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: I.E_Johansson
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Ken Towe
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: I.E_Johansson
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Seppo Renfors
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Prev by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by Date: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Previous by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Next by thread: Re: The Vinland Map's Ink
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|