Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Paul Burke <paul@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 08:39:00 +0100
kenney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I can't say I am greatly interested in the subject and I am not impressed with the way the obsession with Scandinavians has driven out genuine archeological subjects.
I have a go at this at least once a year. The sad truth is that some of the sane end enjoy goading the obsessives into yet more contorted defences of their ideas, just for the joy of seeing what they will come up with next. Their pleading is something REALLY special.
If I had my way, all discussions of that American object should be conducted in Swedish on the ng krs.krs.krs.krs, that thing with wormholes in Latin on alt.vatican.archive.ink, the Mediterranean circular object on alt.phaistos.disk.wheres.something.else.to.test.our.theses.against, and another ng should be set up for a certain atrological adept to answer his own posts.
The few posts remaining just MIGHT contain something worth wasting skiving time on.
Paul Burke .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: O.H.
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: IEJ
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Philip Deitiker
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- From: Eric Stevens
- offer something better (just complaining won't do)
- From: Franz Gnaedinger
- Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Kensington runestone in the Scandinavian press
- Next by Date: offer something better (just complaining won't do)
- Previous by thread: Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
- Next by thread: offer something better (just complaining won't do)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
