Re: Alaca continue to write abusive Ad Hominem
- From: Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:15:52 +1200
On Fri, 27 May 2005 17:50:59 -0600, "Tedd Jacobs"
<Jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"IEJ" wrote...
>> How Alaca can believe himself to be in a position to judge if other writes
>> about archaeology or not, is hard to understand when he himself in 80% of
>> the post writes abusive Ad Hominem. Sad case.
>
>none of peter's comments were 'ad hominem'. nothing of what he said is
>untrue. it is true that there is not much real archaeology in the
>discussions with you. secondly, he justified your position by saying there
>was value in the exercise of discussions with you. your fault you cannot
>comprehend what he had writen. sad case indeed. your ability to use
>plaficationical entrimony needs much improvement, i would have thought
>you'd been schooled beter in that area.
See http://tinyurl.com/923ax
Eric Stevens
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alaca continue to write abusive Ad Hominem
- From: Tom McDonald
- Re: Alaca continue to write abusive Ad Hominem
- References:
- Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
- From: kenney
- Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
- From: Alaca
- Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
- From: Tedd Jacobs
- Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
- From: Alaca
- Alaca continue to write abusive Ad Hominem
- From: IEJ
- Re: Alaca continue to write abusive Ad Hominem
- From: Tedd Jacobs
- Re: Wolter claims secret code hidden in Kensington Runestone
- Prev by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Next by Date: Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
- Previous by thread: Re: Alaca continue to write abusive Ad Hominem
- Next by thread: Re: Alaca continue to write abusive Ad Hominem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|