Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)

On Sat, 28 May 2005 01:24:47 GMT, Philip Deitiker
<Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
>news:t7ef91dm7ac6h96p9i24c7utqed9carf5e@xxxxxxx:
>
>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:44:12 -0600, "Tedd Jacobs"
>> <Jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Eric Stevens" wrote...
>>>
>>>leave it to eric...
>>>
>>>
>> Would you rather it was Philip? :-)
>>
>> I did look before I responded. As far as I can tell, the only
>> article by Paul Burke in which he starts a new thread is the one
>> in which he complains about the range of topics presently under
>> discussion. This is not an uncommon phenomenon and the cure may
>> be partly in his own hands.
>
>His point is that you always take exception with what might be, when
>it is obvious that we are arguing about what will never be. Your not
>under attack here Eric, you actually know where to find solid ground
>if you so choose. Although frequently you choose not to :^).
>
My preferred line is "Build not your arguments on sand".



Eric Stevens

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Kaimanawa Wall once again...
    ... Eric Stevens eric.stevens@sum.co.nz wrote: ... >>he'll end up in my killfile. ... >That was an attack on your webpages, ... He's technically right on this one, Yuri. ...
    (sci.anthropology)
  • Re: Kaimanawa Wall once again...
    ... Eric Stevens eric.stevens@sum.co.nz wrote: ... >>he'll end up in my killfile. ... >That was an attack on your webpages, ... He's technically right on this one, Yuri. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: answer to kenney former Re: Spirit Pond, Maine
    ... Eric Stevens wrote: ... >>That's right, you're just arguing. ... don't throw numbered lists of crap at people. ... Your name with 'crap' got 791 hits, and your name with 'bullshit' got ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
    ... >>> article by Paul Burke in which he starts a new thread is the ... >>when it is obvious that we are arguing about what will never be. ... >>Your not under attack here Eric, you actually know where to find ... >>solid ground if you so choose. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)
    ... > Would you rather it was Philip? ... it is obvious that we are arguing about what will never be. ... under attack here Eric, you actually know where to find solid ground ...
    (sci.archaeology)