Re: Why only crap in this NG? (was Wolter claims ...)

Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
news:0iof91pml844lqaeanmvvlfm3o20nbduqb@xxxxxxx:

> On Sat, 28 May 2005 01:24:47 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> <Donevenask@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@xxxxxxxxx> says in
>>news:t7ef91dm7ac6h96p9i24c7utqed9carf5e@xxxxxxx:
>>
>>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 09:44:12 -0600, "Tedd Jacobs"
>>> <Jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Eric Stevens" wrote...
>>>>
>>>>leave it to eric...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Would you rather it was Philip? :-)
>>>
>>> I did look before I responded. As far as I can tell, the only
>>> article by Paul Burke in which he starts a new thread is the
>>> one in which he complains about the range of topics presently
>>> under discussion. This is not an uncommon phenomenon and the
>>> cure may be partly in his own hands.
>>
>>His point is that you always take exception with what might be,
>>when it is obvious that we are arguing about what will never be.
>>Your not under attack here Eric, you actually know where to find
>>solid ground if you so choose. Although frequently you choose
>>not to :^).
>>
> My preferred line is "Build not your arguments on sand".

Which randomly means 75% of the time you build it on water.

.

Relevant Pages