Re: Alaca continue to write abusive Ad Hominem

On Fri, 27 May 2005 23:11:01 -0500, Tom McDonald
<tmcdonald2672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Eric Stevens wrote:
>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 17:50:59 -0600, "Tedd Jacobs"
>> <Jacobs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"IEJ" wrote...
>>>
>>>>How Alaca can believe himself to be in a position to judge if other writes
>>>>about archaeology or not, is hard to understand when he himself in 80% of
>>>>the post writes abusive Ad Hominem. Sad case.
>>>
>>>none of peter's comments were 'ad hominem'. nothing of what he said is
>>>untrue. it is true that there is not much real archaeology in the
>>>discussions with you. secondly, he justified your position by saying there
>>>was value in the exercise of discussions with you. your fault you cannot
>>>comprehend what he had writen. sad case indeed. your ability to use
>>>plaficationical entrimony needs much improvement, i would have thought
>>>you'd been schooled beter in that area.
>>
>>
>> See http://tinyurl.com/923ax
>
> See how thin on the ground real scholarship is in the English
>speaking world?

The dictionarial quills are smoking in Oxford trying to keep up.



Eric Stevens

.